Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being

作者：

Highlights：

• There were 4 types of sexters: non-sexters, word-only, frequent, and hyper sexters.

• Non-sexters were the most prevalent type of sexter (71.5%).

• Sexters scored higher in sexual satisfaction.

• Sexters were no different in overall relationship satisfaction.

• Frequent and hyper sexters scored more poorly on other relationship variables.

摘要

•There were 4 types of sexters: non-sexters, word-only, frequent, and hyper sexters.•Non-sexters were the most prevalent type of sexter (71.5%).•Sexters scored higher in sexual satisfaction.•Sexters were no different in overall relationship satisfaction.•Frequent and hyper sexters scored more poorly on other relationship variables.

论文关键词：Sexting,Couple relationships,Relationship quality,Media use,Latent profile analysis

论文评审过程：Received 18 May 2017, Revised 29 September 2017, Accepted 5 October 2017, Available online 13 October 2017, Version of Record 20 October 2017.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017