Opus 4.7vsGPT-5.4
Across 13 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.4 leads overall: Opus 4.7 wins 6, GPT-5.4 wins 7, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +7.93.
Opus 4.76 wins(46%)(54%)7 winsGPT-5.4
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 13 shared benchmarks.
Math and Reasoning
GPT-5.4 5/5| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| MathArena Apex | 40.629 / 17Extra-High (With Tools) | 54.178 / 17Extra-High (With Tools) | -13.55 |
| FrontierMath - Tier 4 | 22.9012 / 80Extra-High (No Tools) | 27.1011 / 80Extra-High (No Tools) | -4.20 |
| FrontierMath | 43.806 / 60Extra-High (No Tools) | 47.605 / 60Extra-High (No Tools) | -3.80 |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 93.946 / 10Extra-High (With Tools) | 97.732 / 10Extra-High (With Tools) | -3.79 |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8310 / 29Extra-High (With Tools) | 99.174 / 29Extra-High (With Tools) | -3.34 |
General Knowledge
Even 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 33.30184 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | 11.30374 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | +22 |
| LiveBench | 76.538 / 117Deep Thinking (No Tools) | 77.975 / 117Deep Thinking (No Tools) | -1.44 |
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| PinchBench v2 | 76.0115 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | 75.7017 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | +0.31 |
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| WeirdML v2 | 76.4013 / 52Normal (With Tools) | 57.4431 / 52Normal (With Tools) | +18.96 |
General Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.50110 / 462Normal (No Tools) | 74.80284 / 462Normal (No Tools) | +13.70 |
Long Context
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 75.7082 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 58.30130 / 170Normal (No Tools) | +17.40 |
Text Embedding
GPT-5.4 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Arena | 22.12122 / 126Normal (No Tools) | 32.79112 / 126Normal (No Tools) | -10.67 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,9079 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,83614 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +71.50 |
Specs
| Field | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | 2026-04-16 | 2026-03-05 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Multimodal model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 1000K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 125K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $5 / 1M tokens | $2.5 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $25 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.5 / 1M tokens | $0.25 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $6.25 / 1M tokens | Not public |
Summary
- Opus 4.7leads in:Claw-style Agent Evaluation (1/1), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1), Long Context (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- GPT-5.4leads in:Math and Reasoning (5/5), Text Embedding (1/1)
- Tied in:General Knowledge
On average across the 13 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 7.93 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Opus 4.7 1,907 vs GPT-5.4 1,836 (+71.50).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.