DataLearner logo

Claude Opus 5vsOpus 4.7

Across 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 leads overall: Claude Opus 5 wins 4, Opus 4.7 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +70.09.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5

Anthropic · 2026-07-24 · Reasoning model

Anthropic
Opus 4.7

Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model

Claude Opus 54 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsOpus 4.7

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.

Math and Reasoning

Claude Opus 5 2/2
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Opus 4.7Diff
FrontierMath Tier 4 v273.176 / 42Max (No Tools)31.7117 / 42Max (No Tools)+41.46
FrontierMath v285.615 / 58Max (No Tools)70.1815 / 58Max (No Tools)+15.44

Coding and Software Engineer

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Opus 4.7Diff
WeirdML v286.344 / 52Normal (With Tools)76.4013 / 52Normal (With Tools)+9.94

Writing and Creative Capabilities

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Opus 4.7Diff
Creative Writing2,1213 / 106Normal (No Tools)1,9079 / 106Normal (No Tools)+213.50

Specs

FieldClaude Opus 5Opus 4.7
PublisherAnthropicAnthropic
Release date2026-07-242026-04-16
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
ParametersNot availableNot available
Context length1M1000K
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemClaude Opus 5Opus 4.7
Text input$5 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Text output$25 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.5 / 1M tokens$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache write$6.25 / 1M tokens$6.25 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Claude Opus 5leads in:Math and Reasoning (2/2), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)

On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 scores 70.09 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Claude Opus 5 2,121 vs Opus 4.7 1,907 (+213.50).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.