Claude Opus 5vsGLM-5.2
Across 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 leads overall: Claude Opus 5 wins 4, GLM-5.2 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +138.93.
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · 2026-07-24 · Reasoning model
GLM-5.2
智谱AI · 2026-06-13 · Reasoning model
Claude Opus 54 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsGLM-5.2
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.
Coding and Software Engineer
Claude Opus 5 1/1| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Arena (Coding) | 1,7121 / 35Max (No Tools) | 1,5935 / 35Max (No Tools) | +118.63 |
Math and Reasoning
Claude Opus 5 1/1| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 | 73.176 / 42Max (No Tools) | 29.2720 / 42Max (No Tools) | +43.90 |
Text Embedding
Claude Opus 5 1/1| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Arena | 97.721 / 126Max (No Tools) | 72.3458 / 126Max (No Tools) | +25.38 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
Claude Opus 5 1/1| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 2,1213 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,75322 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +367.80 |
Specs
| Field | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Anthropic | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-07-24 | 2026-06-13 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | MoE |
| Parameters | Not available | 753.33B |
| Context length | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Claude Opus 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $5 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $25 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.5 / 1M tokens | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $6.25 / 1M tokens | Not public |
Summary
- Claude Opus 5leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), Math and Reasoning (1/1), Text Embedding (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 scores 138.93 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Claude Opus 5 2,121 vs GLM-5.2 1,753 (+367.80).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.