DataLearner logo

GLM-5.2vsKimi K2.7 Code

Across 5 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 leads overall: GLM-5.2 wins 5, Kimi K2.7 Code wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +8.44.

智谱AI
GLM-5.2

智谱AI · 2026-06-13 · Reasoning model

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code

Moonshot AI · 2026-06-12 · Coding model

GLM-5.25 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsKimi K2.7 Code

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 5 shared benchmarks.

AI Agent - Tool Usage

GLM-5.2 2/2
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Kimi K2.7 CodeDiff
Terminal-Bench 2.18117 / 44Thinking High (With Tools)67.0434 / 44Thinking (With Tools)+13.96
MCP-Atlas76.8013 / 38Thinking (With Tools)7617 / 38Thinking (With Tools)+0.80

Coding and Software Engineer

GLM-5.2 2/2
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Kimi K2.7 CodeDiff
DeepSWE4421 / 27Deep Thinking (With Tools)3124 / 27Normal (With Tools)+13
Program Bench63.702 / 5Thinking (With Tools)53.603 / 5Thinking (With Tools)+10.10

General Knowledge

GLM-5.2 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Kimi K2.7 CodeDiff
LiveBench76.249 / 115Normal (No Tools)71.8930 / 115Normal (No Tools)+4.35

Specs

FieldGLM-5.2Kimi K2.7 Code
Publisher智谱AIMoonshot AI
Release date2026-06-132026-06-12
Model typeReasoning modelCoding model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters753.33B1T
Context length1M256K
Max output128KNot available

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.2Kimi K2.7 Code
Text input$1.4 / 1M tokens$0.95 / 1M tokens
Text output$4.4 / 1M tokens$4 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.26 / 1M tokens$0.19 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • GLM-5.2leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (2/2), Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), General Knowledge (1/1)

On average across the 5 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores 8.44 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Terminal-Bench 2.1 — GLM-5.2 81 vs Kimi K2.7 Code 67.04 (+13.96).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.