DataLearner logo

GLM-5.2vsNemotron 3 Ultra

Across 4 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 leads overall: GLM-5.2 wins 3, Nemotron 3 Ultra wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +16.26.

智谱AI
GLM-5.2

智谱AI · 2026-06-13 · Reasoning model

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA · 2026-06-04 · Reasoning model

GLM-5.23 wins(75%)(25%)1 winNemotron 3 Ultra

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.

General Knowledge

GLM-5.2 2/2
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Nemotron 3 UltraDiff
LiveBench76.249 / 115Normal (No Tools)51.7888 / 115Normal (No Tools)+24.46
HLE54.7015 / 181Thinking (With Tools)37.4073 / 181Thinking (With Tools)+17.30

AI Agent - Tool Usage

GLM-5.2 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Nemotron 3 UltraDiff
Terminal-Bench 2.18117 / 44Thinking High (With Tools)56.4041 / 44Thinking (With Tools)+24.60

Math and Reasoning

Nemotron 3 Ultra 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Nemotron 3 UltraDiff
IMO-AnswerBench912 / 23Thinking (No Tools)92.301 / 23Thinking (With Tools)-1.30

Specs

FieldGLM-5.2Nemotron 3 Ultra
Publisher智谱AINVIDIA
Release date2026-06-132026-06-04
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters753.33B550B
Context length1M1M
Max output128KNot available

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.2Nemotron 3 Ultra
Text input$1.4 / 1M tokensNot public
Text output$4.4 / 1M tokensNot public
Cache read$0.26 / 1M tokensNot public

One or both models have incomplete public pricing.

Summary

  • GLM-5.2leads in:General Knowledge (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1)
  • Nemotron 3 Ultraleads in:Math and Reasoning (1/1)

On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores 16.26 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Terminal-Bench 2.1 — GLM-5.2 81 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 56.40 (+24.60).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.