DataLearner logo

GLM-5.3-FlashvsQwen3.8-Flash-Next

Across 6 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3-Flash leads overall: GLM-5.3-Flash wins 5, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +6.33.

智谱AI
GLM-5.3-Flash

智谱AI · 2026-08-26 · Multimodal model

阿里巴巴
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

阿里巴巴 · 2026-08-26 · Reasoning model

GLM-5.3-Flash5 wins(83%)(17%)1 winQwen3.8-Flash-Next

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 6 shared benchmarks.

Coding and Software Engineer

GLM-5.3-Flash 2/2
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-NextDiff
NL2Repo-Bench56.304 / 10Max (With Tools)48.108 / 10极高强度思考(工具)+8.20
DeepSWE63.4011 / 30Max (With Tools)58.7016 / 30极高强度思考(工具)+4.70

Agent Level Benchmark

GLM-5.3-Flash 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-NextDiff
Agents' Last Exam26.308 / 13Max (With Tools)24.3012 / 13极高强度思考(工具)+2

AI Agent - Tool Usage

GLM-5.3-Flash 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-NextDiff
Toolathlon-Verified78.401 / 7Max (With Tools)73.504 / 7极高强度思考(工具)+4.90

General Knowledge

GLM-5.3-Flash 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-NextDiff
HLE55.3015 / 183Max (With Tools)35.9078 / 183极高强度思考(无工具)+19.40

Multimodal Understanding

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-NextDiff
CharXiv RQ89.404 / 18Max (With Tools)90.602 / 18极高强度思考(工具)-1.20

Specs

FieldGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-Next
Publisher智谱AI阿里巴巴
Release date2026-08-262026-08-26
Model typeMultimodal modelReasoning model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters320B125B
Context length1M262144
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8-Flash-Next
Text input$0.075 / 1M tokensNot public
Text output$0.25 / 1M tokensNot public
Cache read$0.015 / 1M tokensNot public

One or both models have incomplete public pricing.

Summary

  • GLM-5.3-Flashleads in:Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), Agent Level Benchmark (1/1), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1)
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Nextleads in:Multimodal Understanding (1/1)

On average across the 6 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 6.33 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: HLE — GLM-5.3-Flash 55.30 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 35.90 (+19.40).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.