DataLearner logo

GLM-5.3vsClaude Opus 5

Across 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 leads overall: GLM-5.3 wins 1, Claude Opus 5 wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -18.47.

智谱AI
GLM-5.3

智谱AI · 2026-08-14 · Reasoning model

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5

Anthropic · 2026-07-24 · Reasoning model

GLM-5.31 win(25%)(75%)3 winsClaude Opus 5

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.

AI Agent - Tool Usage

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5Diff
Automation Bench48.201 / 7Max (With Tools)266 / 7Max (With Tools)+22.20

Coding and Software Engineer

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5Diff
DeepSWE66.908 / 26Max (With Tools)68.804 / 26Max (With Tools)-1.90

General Knowledge

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5Diff
HLE62.503 / 181Max (With Tools)64.701 / 181Max (With Tools)-2.20

Productivity Knowledge

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5Diff
GDPval-AA v21,7692 / 13Max (With Tools)1,8611 / 13Max (With Tools)-92

Specs

FieldGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5
Publisher智谱AIAnthropic
Release date2026-08-142026-07-24
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureMoEDense
Parameters753.33BNot available
Context length1M1M
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.3Claude Opus 5
Text inputNot public$5 / 1M tokens
Text outputNot public$25 / 1M tokens
Cache readNot public$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache writeNot public$6.25 / 1M tokens

One or both models have incomplete public pricing.

Summary

  • GLM-5.3leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1)
  • Claude Opus 5leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Productivity Knowledge (1/1)

On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 scores 18.47 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: GDPval-AA v2 — GLM-5.3 1,769 vs Claude Opus 5 1,861 (-92).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.