DataLearner logo

GLM-5.3vsGLM-4.7

Across 3 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 leads overall: GLM-5.3 wins 3, GLM-4.7 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +225.60.

智谱AI
GLM-5.3

智谱AI · 2026-08-14 · Reasoning model

智谱AI
GLM-4.7

智谱AI · 2025-12-22 · Chat model

GLM-5.33 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsGLM-4.7

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.

General Evaluation

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-4.7Diff
GPQA Diamond90.9137 / 270最高(无工具)85.7093 / 270Thinking (No Tools)+5.21

General Knowledge

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-4.7Diff
HLE62.503 / 185Max (With Tools)42.8058 / 185Thinking (With Tools)+19.70

Writing and Creative Capabilities

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-4.7Diff
Creative Writing2,0623 / 99Normal (No Tools)1,41157 / 99Normal (No Tools)+651.90

Specs

FieldGLM-5.3GLM-4.7
Publisher智谱AI智谱AI
Release date2026-08-142025-12-22
Model typeReasoning modelChat model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters744B358B
Context length1M200K
Max output128K132072

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.3GLM-4.7
Text input$1.4 / 1M tokens¥4 / 1M tokens
Text output$4.4 / 1M tokens¥16 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.26 / 1M tokens¥2 / 1M tokens
Cache writeNot public¥0 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • GLM-5.3leads in:General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)

On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 scores 225.60 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — GLM-5.3 2,062 vs GLM-4.7 1,411 (+651.90).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.