DataLearner logo

GLM-5.3vsGLM-5

Across 3 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 leads overall: GLM-5.3 wins 3, GLM-5 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +160.60.

智谱AI
GLM-5.3

智谱AI · 2026-08-14 · Reasoning model

智谱AI
GLM-5

智谱AI · 2026-02-11 · Chat model

GLM-5.33 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsGLM-5

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.

General Evaluation

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-5Diff
GPQA Diamond90.9137 / 270最高(无工具)8691 / 270Thinking (No Tools)+4.91

General Knowledge

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-5Diff
HLE62.503 / 185Max (With Tools)50.4029 / 185Thinking (With Tools)+12.10

Writing and Creative Capabilities

GLM-5.3 1/1
BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-5Diff
Creative Writing2,0623 / 99Normal (No Tools)1,59835 / 99Normal (No Tools)+464.80

Specs

FieldGLM-5.3GLM-5
Publisher智谱AI智谱AI
Release date2026-08-142026-02-11
Model typeReasoning modelChat model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters744B744B
Context length1M200K
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGLM-5.3GLM-5
Text input$1.4 / 1M tokens$1 / 1M tokens
Text output$4.4 / 1M tokens$3.2 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.26 / 1M tokensNot public
Cache writeNot public$0.2 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • GLM-5.3leads in:General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)

On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 scores 160.60 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — GLM-5.3 2,062 vs GLM-5 1,598 (+464.80).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.