GLM-5vsKimi K2.5
Across 13 shared benchmarks, GLM-5 leads overall: GLM-5 wins 8, Kimi K2.5 wins 5, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +1.86.
GLM-58 wins(62%)(38%)5 winsKimi K2.5
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 13 shared benchmarks.
Math and Reasoning
GLM-5 2/3| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath - Tier 4 | 2.1056 / 80Normal (No Tools) | 4.2040 / 80Normal (No Tools) | -2.10 |
| IMO-AnswerBench | 82.5017 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | 81.8018 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | +0.70 |
| AIME 2026 | 92.7010 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | 92.5013 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | +0.20 |
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
GLM-5 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw Bench | 91.705 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | 81.7018 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | +10 |
| Pinch Bench | 86.4013 / 38Thinking (With Tools) | 84.8018 / 38Thinking (With Tools) | +1.60 |
General Knowledge
Even 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 44.7071 / 92Thinking (No Tools) | 65.3058 / 92Thinking (No Tools) | -20.60 |
| HLE | 50.4034 / 197Thinking (With Tools) | 50.2036 / 197Thinking (With Tools) | +0.20 |
Long Context
Kimi K2.5 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 6324 / 29Thinking (No Tools) | 6522 / 29Thinking (No Tools) | -2 |
| LongBench v2 | 60.807 / 14Normal (No Tools) | 616 / 14Normal (No Tools) | -0.20 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 61.1018 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | 50.8035 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | +10.30 |
General Evaluation
Kimi K2.5 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 8694 / 274Thinking (No Tools) | 87.6078 / 274Thinking (No Tools) | -1.60 |
Productivity Knowledge
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPval-AA | 4614 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | 4015 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | +6 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,59839 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,57643 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +21.70 |
Specs
| Field | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | 智谱AI | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | 2026-02-11 | 2026-01-27 |
| Model type | Chat model | Multimodal model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 744B | 1T |
| Context length | 200K | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | GLM-5 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $1 / 1M tokens | $0.6 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $3.2 / 1M tokens | $3 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | Not public | $0.1 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $0.2 / 1M tokens | Not public |
Summary
- GLM-5leads in:Math and Reasoning (2/3), Claw-style Agent Evaluation (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), Productivity Knowledge (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- Kimi K2.5leads in:Long Context (2/2), General Evaluation (1/1)
- Tied in:General Knowledge
On average across the 13 shared benchmarks, GLM-5 scores 1.86 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — GLM-5 1,598 vs Kimi K2.5 1,576 (+21.70).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.