DataLearner logo

GPT-5.1vsClaude Opus 4

Across 9 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 leads overall: GPT-5.1 wins 8, Claude Opus 4 wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +13.07.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1

OpenAI · 2025-11-12 · Reasoning model

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4

Anthropic · 2025-05-23 · Reasoning model

GPT-5.18 wins(89%)(11%)1 winClaude Opus 4

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 9 shared benchmarks.

General Knowledge

GPT-5.1 4/4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4Diff
ARC-AGI72.8028 / 6835.7051 / 68+37.10
HLE26.5097 / 17210.70144 / 172+15.80
ARC-AGI-217.6036 / 628.6042 / 62+9
GPQA Diamond88.1031 / 18779.6085 / 187+8.50

Math and Reasoning

GPT-5.1 3/3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4Diff
FrontierMath26.7013 / 60Thinking High (With Tools)4.5039 / 60+22.20
AIME20259428 / 10775.5066 / 107+18.50
FrontierMath - Tier 412.5029 / 80Thinking High (With Tools)4.2040 / 80+8.30

Coding and Software Engineer

GPT-5.1 1/1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4Diff
SWE-bench Verified76.3034 / 11272.5052 / 112+3.80

Commonsense Reasoning

Claude Opus 4 1/1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4Diff
Simple Bench53.2023 / 63Thinking High (No Tools)58.8017 / 63Thinking (No Tools)-5.60

Specs

FieldGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4
PublisherOpenAIAnthropic
Release date2025-11-122025-05-23
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
ParametersNot availableNot available
Context length400K200K
Max output128K32K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGPT-5.1Claude Opus 4
Text input$1.25 / 1M tokens$15 / 1M tokens
Text output$10 / 1M tokens$75 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.125 / 1M tokens$1.5 / 1M tokens
Cache write$0 / 1M tokens$18.75 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • GPT-5.1leads in:General Knowledge (4/4), Math and Reasoning (3/3), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)
  • Claude Opus 4leads in:Commonsense Reasoning (1/1)

On average across the 9 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 scores 13.07 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: ARC-AGI — GPT-5.1 72.80 vs Claude Opus 4 35.70 (+37.10).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.