DataLearner logo

GPT-5.6 TerravsGLM-5.2

Across 7 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra leads overall: GPT-5.6 Terra wins 6, GLM-5.2 wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +5.86.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI · 2026-06-26 · Reasoning model

智谱AI
GLM-5.2

智谱AI · 2026-06-13 · Reasoning model

GPT-5.6 Terra6 wins(86%)(14%)1 winGLM-5.2

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 7 shared benchmarks.

Coding and Software Engineer

GPT-5.6 Terra 2/3
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2Diff
Text Arena (Coding)1,52216 / 35极高强度思考(无工具)1,5935 / 35最高(无工具)-71.64
DeepSWE69.603 / 27极高强度思考(工具)4421 / 27Deep Thinking (With Tools)+25.60
WeirdML v278.2710 / 52Thinking High (With Tools)67.3121 / 52Thinking High (With Tools)+10.96

Math and Reasoning

GPT-5.6 Terra 2/2
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2Diff
FrontierMath Tier 4 v270.736 / 34最高(无工具)29.2716 / 34最高(无工具)+41.46
FrontierMath v285.964 / 34最高(无工具)59.2119 / 34最高(无工具)+26.76

AI Agent - Tool Usage

GPT-5.6 Terra 1/1
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2Diff
Terminal-Bench 2.187.407 / 44最高(无工具)8117 / 44Thinking High (With Tools)+6.40

General Evaluation

GPT-5.6 Terra 1/1
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2Diff
GPQA Diamond93.3116 / 226最高(无工具)91.8626 / 226最高(无工具)+1.45

Specs

FieldGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2
PublisherOpenAI智谱AI
Release date2026-06-262026-06-13
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseMoE
ParametersNot available753.33B
Context length1.05M1M
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGPT-5.6 TerraGLM-5.2
Text input$2.5 / 1M tokens$1.4 / 1M tokens
Text output$15 / 1M tokens$4.4 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.25 / 1M tokens$0.26 / 1M tokens
Cache write$3.125 / 1M tokensNot public

Summary

  • GPT-5.6 Terraleads in:Coding and Software Engineer (2/3), Math and Reasoning (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1)

On average across the 7 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra scores 5.86 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Text Arena (Coding) — GPT-5.6 Terra 1,522 vs GLM-5.2 1,593 (-71.64).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.