DataLearner logo

Kimi K3vsKimi K2.5

Across 4 shared benchmarks, Kimi K3 leads overall: Kimi K3 wins 4, Kimi K2.5 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +15.52.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

Moonshot AI · 2026-07-16 · Reasoning model

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5

Moonshot AI · 2026-01-27 · Multimodal model

Kimi K34 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsKimi K2.5

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.

General Knowledge

Kimi K3 2/2
BenchmarkKimi K3Kimi K2.5Diff
GPQA Diamond93.508 / 187最高(无工具)87.6037 / 187Thinking (No Tools)+5.90
HLE5610 / 170Max (With Tools)50.2025 / 170Thinking (With Tools)+5.80

AI Agent - Information Search

Kimi K3 1/1
BenchmarkKimi K3Kimi K2.5Diff
BrowseComp91.201 / 52Max (With Tools + Internet)60.6035 / 52Thinking (With Tools + Internet)+30.60

AI Agent - Tool Usage

Kimi K3 1/1
BenchmarkKimi K3Kimi K2.5Diff
MCP-Atlas84.202 / 27Max (With Tools)64.4019 / 27Normal (With Tools)+19.80

Specs

FieldKimi K3Kimi K2.5
PublisherMoonshot AIMoonshot AI
Release date2026-07-162026-01-27
Model typeReasoning modelMultimodal model
ArchitectureMoEMoE
Parameters2.8T1T
Context length1M256K
Max output1M16K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemKimi K3Kimi K2.5
Text input¥20 / 1M tokens$0.6 / 1M tokens
Text output¥100 / 1M tokens$3 / 1M tokens
Cache read¥2 / 1M tokens$0.1 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Kimi K3leads in:General Knowledge (2/2), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1)

On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Kimi K3 scores 15.52 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: BrowseComp — Kimi K3 91.20 vs Kimi K2.5 60.60 (+30.60).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.