MiniCPM5-1BvsGemma 4 E4B
Across 3 shared benchmarks, Gemma 4 E4B leads overall: MiniCPM5-1B wins 0, Gemma 4 E4B wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -23.96.
MiniCPM5-1B
OpenBMB · 2026-05-01 · Reasoning model
Gemma 4 E4B
DeepMind · 2026-04-02 · Multimodal model
MiniCPM5-1B0 wins(0%)(100%)3 winsGemma 4 E4B
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.
General Evaluation
Gemma 4 E4B 1/1| Benchmark | MiniCPM5-1B | Gemma 4 E4B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.26268 / 274Thinking (No Tools) | 58.60232 / 274Thinking (No Tools) | -32.34 |
General Knowledge
Gemma 4 E4B 1/1| Benchmark | MiniCPM5-1B | Gemma 4 E4B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 48.85124 / 134Thinking (No Tools) | 69.4096 / 134Thinking (No Tools) | -20.55 |
Long Context
Gemma 4 E4B 1/1| Benchmark | MiniCPM5-1B | Gemma 4 E4B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 5170 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 24165 / 170Normal (No Tools) | -19 |
Specs
| Field | MiniCPM5-1B | Gemma 4 E4B |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | OpenBMB | DeepMind |
| Release date | 2026-05-01 | 2026-04-02 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Multimodal model |
| Architecture | MoE | Dense |
| Parameters | 1.08B | 8B |
| Context length | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | Not available | 8K |
Summary
- Gemma 4 E4Bleads in:General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Long Context (1/1)
On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, Gemma 4 E4B scores 23.96 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: GPQA Diamond — MiniCPM5-1B 26.26 vs Gemma 4 E4B 58.60 (-32.34).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.