MiniMax M2.5vsGLM-5
Across 7 shared benchmarks, MiniMax M2.5 leads overall: MiniMax M2.5 wins 4, GLM-5 wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -33.90.
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMaxAI · 2026-02-12 · Reasoning model
GLM-5
智谱AI · 2026-02-11 · Chat model
MiniMax M2.54 wins(57%)(43%)3 winsGLM-5
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 7 shared benchmarks.
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
MiniMax M2.5 2/2| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinch Bench | 87.807 / 38Thinking (With Tools) | 86.4013 / 38Thinking (With Tools) | +1.40 |
| Claw Bench | 92.104 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | 91.705 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | +0.40 |
AI Agent - Information Search
MiniMax M2.5 1/1| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | 76.3025 / 57Thinking (With Tools) | 75.9026 / 57Thinking (With Tools) | +0.40 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 51.7032 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | 61.1018 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | -9.40 |
General Knowledge
MiniMax M2.5 1/1| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.6791 / 147Thinking (No Tools) | 44.67111 / 147Thinking (No Tools) | +19 |
Productivity Knowledge
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPval-AA | 3611 / 15Thinking (No Tools) | 468 / 15Thinking (No Tools) | -10 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
GLM-5 1/1| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,35868 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,59839 / 106Normal (No Tools) | -239.10 |
Specs
| Field | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | MiniMaxAI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-02-12 | 2026-02-11 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Chat model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 229B | 744B |
| Context length | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | Not available | 128K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | MiniMax M2.5 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $0.3 / 1M tokens | $1 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $2.4 / 1M tokens | $3.2 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $0.2 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- MiniMax M2.5leads in:Claw-style Agent Evaluation (2/2), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1)
- GLM-5leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), Productivity Knowledge (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
On average across the 7 shared benchmarks, GLM-5 scores 33.90 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — MiniMax M2.5 1,358 vs GLM-5 1,598 (-239.10).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.