Muse Glimmer-30BvsQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Across 4 shared benchmarks, Muse Glimmer-30B leads overall: Muse Glimmer-30B wins 4, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +1.72.
Muse Glimmer-30B
Facebook AI研究实验室 · 2026-08-10 · Reasoning model
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
阿里巴巴 · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model
Muse Glimmer-30B4 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.
Coding and Software Engineer
Muse Glimmer-30B 2/2| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer-30B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 7637 / 114Thinking High (With Tools) | 73.4048 / 114Thinking (No Tools) | +2.60 |
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 51.2041 / 57Thinking High (With Tools) | 49.5046 / 57Thinking (No Tools) | +1.70 |
General Knowledge
Muse Glimmer-30B 1/1| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer-30B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 22117 / 181Thinking High (No Tools) | 21.40123 / 181Thinking (No Tools) | +0.60 |
Math and Reasoning
Muse Glimmer-30B 1/1| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer-30B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2026 | 94.706 / 19Thinking High (No Tools) | 92.7010 / 19Thinking (No Tools) | +2 |
Specs
| Field | Muse Glimmer-30B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Facebook AI研究实验室 | 阿里巴巴 |
| Release date | 2026-08-10 | 2026-04-16 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | MoE |
| Parameters | 29.6B | 35B |
| Context length | 128K+ | 200K |
| Max output | Not available | 80K |
Summary
- Muse Glimmer-30Bleads in:Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), General Knowledge (1/1), Math and Reasoning (1/1)
On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Muse Glimmer-30B scores 1.72 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: SWE-bench Verified — Muse Glimmer-30B 76 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 73.40 (+2.60).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.