Qwen3.6-27BvsHaiku 4.5
Across 4 shared benchmarks, Qwen3.6-27B leads overall: Qwen3.6-27B wins 3, Haiku 4.5 wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +15.54.
Qwen3.6-27B
阿里巴巴 · 2026-04-22 · Reasoning model
Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · 2025-10-15 · Multimodal model
Qwen3.6-27B3 wins(75%)(25%)1 winHaiku 4.5
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
Haiku 4.5 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw Bench | 72.4027 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | 89.4011 / 29Thinking (With Tools) | -17 |
General Evaluation
Qwen3.6-27B 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.85103 / 274Normal (No Tools) | 60.50227 / 274Normal (No Tools) | +24.35 |
General Knowledge
Qwen3.6-27B 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench | 64.0354 / 117Normal (No Tools) | 45.33105 / 117Normal (No Tools) | +18.70 |
Text Embedding
Qwen3.6-27B 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Arena | 53.7882 / 126Normal (No Tools) | 17.68124 / 126Normal (No Tools) | +36.10 |
Specs
| Field | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | 阿里巴巴 | Anthropic |
| Release date | 2026-04-22 | 2025-10-15 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Multimodal model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | 27B | Not available |
| Context length | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | 16K | 64K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Qwen3.6-27B | Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | Not public | $1 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | Not public | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | Not public | $0.1 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $1.25 / 1M tokens |
One or both models have incomplete public pricing.
Summary
- Qwen3.6-27Bleads in:General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Text Embedding (1/1)
- Haiku 4.5leads in:Claw-style Agent Evaluation (1/1)
On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Qwen3.6-27B scores 15.54 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Context Arena — Qwen3.6-27B 53.78 vs Haiku 4.5 17.68 (+36.10).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.