DataLearner logo

Qwen3.6-27BvsGemini 3.0 Flash

Across 3 shared benchmarks, Qwen3.6-27B leads overall: Qwen3.6-27B wins 2, Gemini 3.0 Flash wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +2.03.

阿里巴巴
Qwen3.6-27B

阿里巴巴 · 2026-04-22 · Reasoning model

Google Deep Mind
Gemini 3.0 Flash

Google Deep Mind · 2025-12-17 · Chat model

Qwen3.6-27B2 wins(67%)(33%)1 winGemini 3.0 Flash

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.

AI Agent - Tool Usage

Qwen3.6-27B 1/1
BenchmarkQwen3.6-27BGemini 3.0 FlashDiff
Terminal Bench 2.059.3020 / 48Thinking (With Tools)47.6039 / 48Thinking (With Tools)+11.70

Claw-style Agent Evaluation

Gemini 3.0 Flash 1/1
BenchmarkQwen3.6-27BGemini 3.0 FlashDiff
Claw Bench72.4027 / 29Thinking (With Tools)85.7015 / 29Thinking (With Tools)-13.30

General Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B 1/1
BenchmarkQwen3.6-27BGemini 3.0 FlashDiff
LiveBench64.0354 / 117Normal (No Tools)56.3581 / 117Normal (No Tools)+7.68

Specs

FieldQwen3.6-27BGemini 3.0 Flash
Publisher阿里巴巴Google Deep Mind
Release date2026-04-222025-12-17
Model typeReasoning modelChat model
ArchitectureDenseDense
Parameters27BNot available
Context length128K2000K
Max output16K64K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemQwen3.6-27BGemini 3.0 Flash
Text inputNot public$0.5 / 1M tokens
Text outputNot public$3 / 1M tokens

One or both models have incomplete public pricing.

Summary

  • Qwen3.6-27Bleads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1)
  • Gemini 3.0 Flashleads in:Claw-style Agent Evaluation (1/1)

On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, Qwen3.6-27B scores 2.03 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Claw Bench — Qwen3.6-27B 72.40 vs Gemini 3.0 Flash 85.70 (-13.30).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.