See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
Best overall
Claude Opus 4.8 · 80.03
Best single
Claude Opus 4.8 · GPQA Diamond 93.60
Modality coverage
Claude Opus 4.8 · 2 modalities
Head to head
3
Benchmarks
3
Wins
0
Losses
+9.67
Average diff
Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.
3 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.8 | Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
GPQA Diamond 综合评估 | 93.60Thinking Level · High | 87.00Extended Thinking |
HLE 综合评估 | 57.90Extended Thinking | Tools | 43.20Extended Thinking | Tools |
SWE-bench Verified 编程与软件工程 | 88.60Extended Thinking | Tools | 80.90Extended Thinking | Tools |
Side-by-side input/output token pricing
Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.
| Features & specs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | Opus 4.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-05-28 | 2025-11-25 |
Context length | 1M | 200K |
Max output | 128000 | 65536 |
MoE | No | No |
LicenseCode Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Weights Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Commercial use | 不开源 | 不开源 |
Modality supportText Input/Output | / | / |
Image Input/Output | / | / |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 | Introducing Claude Opus 4.5 |
DataLearner blog | Anthropic发布Claude Opus 4.8:定价不变,编程与智能体能力小幅提升, | Not provided |

Opus 4.5
Anthropic