See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google Deep Mind
Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.
Relative edge: AI Agent - 工具使用 +14.1 / Relative gap: none clear
Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: AI Agent - 工具使用 -14.1
Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.
Best overall
Gemini 3.5 Flash · 65.21
Best single
Gemini 3.5 Flash · MCP-Atlas 83.60
Modality coverage
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 2 modalities
Head to head
3
Benchmarks
2
Wins
1
Losses
+6.88
Average diff
Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.
3 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
Side-by-side input/output token pricing
Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.
| Features & specs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle Deep Mind | Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-06-20 | 2026-02-17 |
Context length | 1M | 1M |
Max output | 65536 | 8192 |
MoE | No | No |
Supported modes | No mode data | 常规模式(Non-Thinking Mode)思考模式(Thinking Mode) |
LicenseCode Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Weights Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Commercial use | 不开源 | 不开源 |
Modality supportText Input/Output | Not provided | / |
Image Input/Output | Not provided | / |
ResourcesPaper / report | Gemini 3.5: frontier intelligence with action | Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.6 |

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic