See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。
GPT-5.1
OpenAI
Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.
Relative edge: Agent能力评测 +29.8 / Relative gap: 常识推理 -9.2
Relative edge: 常识推理 +9.2 / Relative gap: Agent能力评测 -29.8
Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.
Best overall
GPT-5.1 · 58.12
Best single
GPT-5.1 · τ²-Bench - Telecom 95.60
Modality coverage
GPT-5.1 · 2 modalities
Head to head
13
Benchmarks
12
Wins
1
Losses
+13.95
Average diff
Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.
13 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1 | Gemini 2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
ARC-AGI 综合评估 | 72.80Thinking Level · High | 37.00Thinking Enabled |
ARC-AGI-2 综合评估 | 17.60Thinking Level · High | 4.90Thinking Enabled |
GPQA Diamond 综合评估 | 88.10Thinking Enabled | 86.40Thinking Enabled |
HLE 综合评估 | 42.70Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 21.60Thinking Enabled |
SWE-bench Verified 编程与软件工程 | 76.30Thinking Level · High | 67.20Thinking Enabled |
AIME2025 数学推理 | 94.00Thinking Level · High | 88.00Thinking Enabled |
FrontierMath 数学推理 | 26.70Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 11.00Standard Mode |
12.50Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 2.10Standard Mode | |
MMMU 多模态理解 | 85.40Thinking Level · High | 82.00Thinking Enabled |
Simple Bench 常识推理 | 53.20Thinking Level · High | 62.40Thinking Enabled |
Terminal Bench Hard Agent能力评测 | 43.00Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 25.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools |
τ²-Bench - Telecom Agent能力评测 | 95.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 54.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools |
Terminal Bench 2.0 AI Agent - 工具使用 | 47.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 32.60Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools |
Side-by-side input/output token pricing
Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.
| Features & specs | GPT-5.1OpenAI | Gemini 2.5-ProGoogle Deep Mind |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2025-11-12 | 2025-06-05 |
Context length | 400K | 1000K |
Max output | 131072 | 65536 |
MoE | No | No |
Supported modes | 常规模式（Non-Thinking Mode）思考模式（Thinking Mode） | 常规模式（Non-Thinking Mode）思考模式（Thinking Mode）深度思考（Deeper Thinking Mode） |
LicenseCode Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Weights Open Source | Not provided | Not provided |
Commercial use | 不开源 | 不开源 |
Modality supportText Input/Output | / | / |
Image Input/Output | / | / |
ResourcesPaper / report | GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT | Try the latest Gemini 2.5 Pro before general availability. |
DataLearner blog | OpenAI发布GPT-5.1：围绕“对话体验、一致性、任务适配性”进行的系统化优化的小幅更新！ | Google发布Gemini 2.5 Pro: Gemini系列第一个2.5版本的模型，最高支持200万上下文，全模态输入，推理大模型，LMArena排名第一 |
Gemini 2.5-Pro
Google Deep Mind
