Claude Opus 4.8vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
在 13 个共同 benchmark 中,Claude Opus 4.8 整体领先:Claude Opus 4.8 领先 8 项,Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 领先 5 项,持平 0 项,平均分差 +12.04。
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · 2026-05-28 · 推理大模型
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind · 2026-02-20 · 多模态大模型
Claude Opus 4.88 项(62%)(38%)5 项Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
评测分数
按能力类目分组,每组内按分差大小排列;共 13 项。
Coding and Software Engineer
Claude Opus 4.8 领先 4/5| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Arena (Coding) | 1,5459 / 35Normal (No Tools) | 1,46123 / 35Normal (No Tools) | +83.56 |
| DeepSWE | 5913 / 27Deep Thinking (With Tools) | 1227 / 27Thinking High (With Tools) | +47 |
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 69.204 / 57Extended (with tools) | 54.2034 / 57Thinking High (With Tools) | +15 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 88.605 / 114Extended (with tools) | 80.6011 / 114Thinking High (With Tools) | +8 |
| WeirdML v2 | 70.4518 / 52Normal (With Tools) | 72.1017 / 52Normal (With Tools) | -1.65 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Claude Opus 4.8 领先 3/3| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-Verified | 83.404 / 26Extended (with tools) | 76.2012 / 26Thinking (With Tools) | +7.20 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 78.9020 / 44Thinking High (With Tools) | 73.8028 / 44Thinking High (With Tools) | +5.10 |
| MCP-Atlas | 82.206 / 38Deep Thinking (With Tools) | 78.2012 / 38Thinking High (With Tools) | +4 |
General Knowledge
胶着 2/2| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 57.908 / 181Extended (with tools) | 51.4024 / 181Thinking High (With Tools) | +6.50 |
| LiveBench | 78.794 / 115Deep Thinking (No Tools) | 79.933 / 115Thinking High (No Tools) | -1.14 |
AI Agent - Information Search
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 领先 1/1| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | 84.309 / 54Thinking High (With Tools + Internet) | 85.905 / 54Thinking High (With Tools + Internet) | -1.60 |
常识推理
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 领先 1/1| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 64.8010 / 67Normal (No Tools) | 79.602 / 67Normal (No Tools) | -14.80 |
科学与综合推理
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 领先 1/1| 评测项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 分差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.6011 / 226Thinking High (No Tools) | 94.304 / 226Thinking High (No Tools) | -0.70 |
规格对比
| 字段 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| 发布机构 | Anthropic | Google Deep Mind |
| 发布时间 | 2026-05-28 | 2026-02-20 |
| 模型类型 | 推理大模型 | 多模态大模型 |
| 架构 | 稠密模型 | 稠密模型 |
| 参数规模 | 暂无数据 | 暂无数据 |
| 上下文长度 | 1M | 1M |
| 最大输出 | 125K | 64K |
API 调用价格
价格优先使用 DataLearner 配置的 API 记录;缺失项不做推测。
| 价格项 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| 文本输入 | $5 / 1M tokens | $2 / 1M tokens |
| 文本输出 | $25 / 1M tokens | $12 / 1M tokens |
| 缓存读取 | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 暂无公开价格 |
| 缓存写入 | $6.25 / 1M tokens | 暂无公开价格 |
小结
- Claude Opus 4.8在以下类目领先:Coding and Software Engineer (4/5)、AI Agent - Tool Usage (3/3)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview在以下类目领先:AI Agent - Information Search (1/1)、常识推理 (1/1)、科学与综合推理 (1/1)
- 胶着类目:General Knowledge
13 个共同 benchmark 上,Claude Opus 4.8 平均高出 12.04 分。
单项差距最大的 benchmark:Text Arena (Coding) — Claude Opus 4.8 1,545,Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,461(分差 +83.56)。
本页正文由结构化模型、价格与 benchmark 数据生成,不使用实时 LLM 撰写。