DataLearner 标志

Kimi K3vsClaude Opus 4.8

在 31 个同模式 benchmark 中,Kimi K3 整体领先:Kimi K3 领先 17 项,Claude Opus 4.8 领先 14 项,持平 0 项,平均分差 +6.03。另有 8 项测试模式不同,仅供参考。

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

Moonshot AI · 2026-07-16 · 推理大模型

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · 2026-05-28 · 推理大模型

Kimi K317 项(55%)(45%)14 项Claude Opus 4.8

评测分数

按能力类目分组,每组内按分差大小排列;共 31 项。

跨应用与工具编排

Kimi K3 领先 4/4
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
MCPMark-Verified94.501 / 8Max (With Tools)76.386 / 8Max (With Tools)+18.12
Agents' Last Exam28.3010 / 20Max (With Tools)2712 / 20Max (With Tools)+1.30
Toolathlon-Verified76.506 / 36Max (With Tools)76.207 / 36Max (With Tools)+0.30
MCP-Atlas82.3010 / 53Max (With Tools)82.2011 / 53Max (With Tools)+0.10

客服与业务流程

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 2/3
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
τ³-Banking37.1142 / 171Max (With Tools)39.6934 / 171Max (With Tools)-2.58
SAGE54.263 / 65Max (With Tools)54.792 / 65Max (With Tools)-0.53
Public Benefits Bench v1.168.277 / 26Max (With Tools)68.138 / 26Max (With Tools)+0.14

法律

Kimi K3 领先 3/3
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Harvey Lab-AA94.642 / 44Max (With Tools)91.0811 / 44Max (With Tools)+3.56
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark12.928 / 50Max (With Tools)9.5814 / 50Max (With Tools)+3.34
Legal Research Bench44.2013 / 46Max (With Tools)43.7514 / 46Max (With Tools)+0.45

临床工作与医疗决策

胶着 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
MedCode48.8820 / 66Max (With Tools)53.228 / 66Max (With Tools)-4.34
MedScribe87.9610 / 68Max (With Tools)85.7517 / 68Max (With Tools)+2.21

仓库修复与多文件工程

Kimi K3 领先 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
DeepSWE68.5132 / 103Max (With Tools)58.9757 / 103Max (With Tools)+9.54
APEX-SWE4818 / 73Max (With Tools)43.9031 / 73Max (With Tools)+4.10

数学

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
FrontierMath Tier 4 v239.0230 / 71Max (With Tools)56.1023 / 71Max (With Tools)-17.07
FrontierMath v272.1822 / 114Max (With Tools)8015 / 114Max (With Tools)-7.82

科学知识与推理

胶着 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
CritPt23.4030 / 206Max (No Tools)20.9035 / 206Max (No Tools)+2.50
GPQA Diamond91.9224 / 258Thinking High (No Tools)93.6013 / 258Thinking High (No Tools)-1.68

科学计算与科研编程

胶着 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
SciCode59.508 / 135Max (No Tools)54.4045 / 135Max (No Tools)+5.10
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.17.1014 / 18Max (With Tools)10.5011 / 18Max (With Tools)-3.40

金融

胶着 2/2
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
EMB (Excel Modeling)66.4018 / 46Max (With Tools)69.3713 / 46Max (With Tools)-2.97
Finance Agent v254.4021 / 46Max (With Tools)53.9222 / 46Max (With Tools)+0.48

专业数据分析

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
AA-AnalystAgent38.7514 / 29Max (With Tools + Internet)459 / 29Max (With Tools + Internet)-6.25

写作与创意表达

Kimi K3 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Creative Writing2,0825 / 112Normal (No Tools)1,84018 / 112Normal (No Tools)+242.50

多轮记忆与持续上下文

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Context Arena71.7559 / 126Max (No Tools)90.0415 / 126Max (No Tools)-18.29

抽象归纳与泛化

Kimi K3 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
ARC-AGI-194.5038 / 226Max (With Tools)92.5053 / 226Max (With Tools)+2

文档与图表理解

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
GDP.pdf2232 / 124Max (No Tools)22.8028 / 124Max (No Tools)-0.80

程序生成与编辑

Kimi K3 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Vibe Code Bench v1.184.9612 / 66Max (With Tools)82.7215 / 66Max (With Tools)+2.24

维护、优化与工程管理

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Code Migration16.1039 / 48Max (With Tools)47.2513 / 48Max (With Tools)-31.15

自主开发与终端任务

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Terminal-Bench 4.012.6059 / 105Max (With Tools)23.6440 / 105Max (With Tools)-11.04

跨能力聚合指数

Claude Opus 4.8 领先 1/1
评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8分差
Vals Index57.8120 / 42Max (With Tools)60.9111 / 42Max (With Tools)-3.10

测试模式不同的成绩

共 8 项。两款模型的公开成绩来自不同测试模式,分数不直接可比,不计入胜负和平均分差。

评测项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8
Vals Index v2.150.70Reported best (effort unspecified)55.10Max (task-specific tools)
SimpleBench60.70Max (No Tools)64.80Normal (No Tools)
LiveBench79.19Reported best (effort unspecified)78.93Deep Thinking (No Tools)
OSWorld-Verified84.80Max (With Tools)83.40Extended (With Tools)
BrowseComp91.20Max (With Tools + Internet)84.30Thinking High (With Tools + Internet)
HLE59.80Max (With Tools)57.90Extended (With Tools)
MathArena Apex65.60Max (No Tools)81.25Max (With Tools)
Text Arena (Coding)1,682Max (No Tools)1,545Normal (No Tools)

规格对比

字段Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8
发布机构Moonshot AIAnthropic
发布时间2026-07-162026-05-28
模型类型推理大模型推理大模型
架构MoE 架构稠密模型
参数规模2.8万亿暂无数据
上下文长度1M1M
最大输出1M125K

API 调用价格

价格优先使用 DataLearner 配置的 API 记录;缺失项不做推测。

价格项Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.8
文本输入¥20 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
文本输出¥100 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
缓存读取¥2 / 1M tokens$0.5 / 1M tokens
缓存写入暂无公开价格$6.25 / 1M tokens

小结

  • Kimi K3在以下类目领先:跨应用与工具编排 (4/4)、法律 (3/3)、仓库修复与多文件工程 (2/2)、写作与创意表达 (1/1)、抽象归纳与泛化 (1/1)、程序生成与编辑 (1/1)
  • Claude Opus 4.8在以下类目领先:客服与业务流程 (2/3)、数学 (2/2)、专业数据分析 (1/1)、多轮记忆与持续上下文 (1/1)、文档与图表理解 (1/1)、维护、优化与工程管理 (1/1)、自主开发与终端任务 (1/1)、跨能力聚合指数 (1/1)
  • 胶着类目:临床工作与医疗决策、科学知识与推理、科学计算与科研编程、金融

31 个同模式 benchmark 上,Kimi K3 平均高出 6.03 分。

单项差距最大的 benchmark:Creative Writing — Kimi K3 2,082,Claude Opus 4.8 1,840(分差 +242.50)。

本页正文由结构化模型、价格与 benchmark 数据生成,不使用实时 LLM 撰写。