Opus 4.7vsOpus 4.5
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 leads overall: Opus 4.7 wins 11, Opus 4.5 wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +30.51.
Opus 4.711 wins(92%)(8%)1 winOpus 4.5
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 12 shared benchmarks.
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 3/3| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Arena (Coding) | 1,5627 / 35Normal (No Tools) | 1,47920 / 35Normal (No Tools) | +83.39 |
| GSO | 44.121 / 21Normal (With Tools) | 26.508 / 21Normal (With Tools) | +17.62 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.606 / 116Extended (with tools) | 80.909 / 116Extended (with tools) | +6.70 |
Agent Level Benchmark
Even 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench Hard | 54.5015 / 244Normal (With Tools) | 40.9050 / 244Normal (With Tools) | +13.60 |
| τ²-Bench - Telecom | 74128 / 264Normal (With Tools) | 86.3082 / 264Normal (With Tools) | -12.30 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 69.406 / 48Extended (with tools) | 59.3020 / 48Extended (with tools) | +10.10 |
General Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.50110 / 462Normal (No Tools) | 81220 / 462Normal (No Tools) | +7.50 |
General Knowledge
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 5.1094 / 200Normal (No Tools) | 0.30182 / 200Normal (No Tools) | +4.80 |
Instruction Following
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IF Bench | 43.60189 / 282Normal (No Tools) | 43194 / 282Normal (No Tools) | +0.60 |
Long Context
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 75.7082 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 70.7099 / 170Normal (No Tools) | +5 |
Multimodal Understanding
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-Pro | 76.4073 / 228Normal (No Tools) | 71.20121 / 228Normal (No Tools) | +5.20 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,9079 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,68329 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +223.90 |
Specs
| Field | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Release date | 2026-04-16 | 2025-11-25 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 1000K | 200K |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $5 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $25 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.5 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $6.25 / 1M tokens | $6.25 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Opus 4.7leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (3/3), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Instruction Following (1/1), Long Context (1/1), Multimodal Understanding (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- Tied in:Agent Level Benchmark
On average across the 12 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 30.51 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Opus 4.7 1,907 vs Opus 4.5 1,683 (+223.90).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.