Opus 4.7vsClaude Opus 4.6
Across 22 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 leads overall: Opus 4.7 wins 18, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 4, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +7.34.
Opus 4.7
Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · 2026-02-05 · Reasoning model
Opus 4.718 wins(82%)(18%)4 winsClaude Opus 4.6
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 22 shared benchmarks.
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 4/4| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSO | 44.121 / 21Normal (With Tools) | 33.335 / 21Normal (With Tools) | +10.79 |
| WeirdML v2 | 76.4013 / 52Normal (With Tools) | 65.9023 / 52Normal (With Tools) | +10.50 |
| Text Arena (Coding) | 1,5627 / 35Normal (No Tools) | 1,5558 / 35Normal (No Tools) | +7.04 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.606 / 116Extended (with tools) | 80.8410 / 116Extended (with tools) | +6.76 |
Agent Level Benchmark
Opus 4.7 2/3| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ³-Banking | 40.2130 / 164Max (With Tools) | 27.3269 / 164Max (With Tools) | +12.89 |
| τ²-Bench - Telecom | 74128 / 264Normal (With Tools) | 84.8090 / 264Normal (With Tools) | -10.80 |
| Terminal Bench Hard | 54.5015 / 244Normal (With Tools) | 48.5025 / 244Normal (With Tools) | +6 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Opus 4.7 3/3| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-Verified | 7811 / 26Extended (with tools) | 72.7016 / 26Extended (with tools) | +5.30 |
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 69.406 / 48Extended (with tools) | 65.4011 / 48Extended (with tools) | +4 |
| MCP-Atlas | 79.1013 / 43Deep Thinking (With Tools) | 76.8018 / 43Deep Thinking (With Tools) | +2.30 |
General Knowledge
Opus 4.7 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 33.30184 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | 19.10299 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | +14.20 |
| CritPt | 5.1094 / 200Normal (No Tools) | 2.80120 / 200Normal (No Tools) | +2.30 |
Math and Reasoning
Opus 4.7 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 | 31.7117 / 42Max (No Tools) | 26.8323 / 42Max (No Tools) | +4.88 |
| FrontierMath v2 | 70.1815 / 58Max (No Tools) | 65.9618 / 58Max (No Tools) | +4.21 |
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| PinchBench v2 | 76.0115 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | 69.9026 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | +6.11 |
Commonsense Reasoning
Claude Opus 4.6 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 61.7027 / 93Normal (No Tools) | 67.6019 / 93Normal (No Tools) | -5.90 |
General Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.50110 / 462Normal (No Tools) | 84176 / 462Normal (No Tools) | +4.50 |
Instruction Following
Claude Opus 4.6 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IF Bench | 43.60189 / 282Normal (No Tools) | 44.60182 / 282Normal (No Tools) | -1 |
Long Context
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 75.7082 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 67116 / 170Normal (No Tools) | +8.70 |
Multimodal Understanding
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-Pro | 76.4073 / 227Normal (No Tools) | 72.50114 / 227Normal (No Tools) | +3.90 |
Text Embedding
Claude Opus 4.6 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Arena | 22.12122 / 126Normal (No Tools) | 60.3376 / 126Normal (No Tools) | -38.21 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,9079 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,80419 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +103 |
Specs
| Field | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Release date | 2026-04-16 | 2026-02-05 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 1000K | 1000K |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $5 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $25 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.5 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $6.25 / 1M tokens | $6.25 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Opus 4.7leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (4/4), Agent Level Benchmark (2/3), AI Agent - Tool Usage (3/3), General Knowledge (2/2), Math and Reasoning (2/2), Claw-style Agent Evaluation (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1), Long Context (1/1), Multimodal Understanding (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- Claude Opus 4.6leads in:Commonsense Reasoning (1/1), Instruction Following (1/1), Text Embedding (1/1)
On average across the 22 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 7.34 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Opus 4.7 1,907 vs Claude Opus 4.6 1,804 (+103).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.