Opus 4.7vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 leads overall: Opus 4.7 wins 6, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 5, with 1 ties and an average score difference of +2.02.
Opus 4.7
Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind · 2026-02-20 · Multimodal model
Opus 4.76 wins(50%)Ties1(42%)5 winsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 12 shared benchmarks.
General Knowledge
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 3/5| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 54.708 / 157Extended (with tools) | 51.4015 / 157Thinking High (With Tools) | +3.30 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.809 / 59最高（无工具） | 77.107 / 59Thinking High (No Tools) | -1.30 |
| MMLU | 91.506 / 65Normal (No Tools) | 92.603 / 65Thinking High (No Tools) | -1.10 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.204 / 178Extended (no tools) | 94.303 / 178Thinking High (No Tools) | -0.10 |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 05 / 6Thinking High (No Tools) | 03 / 6Thinking High (No Tools) | — |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Even 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| TerminalBench 2.1 | 69.708 / 13Thinking High (With Tools) | 70.707 / 13Thinking High (With Tools) | -1 |
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 69.406 / 46Extended (with tools) | 68.508 / 46Thinking High (With Tools) | +0.90 |
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 64.304 / 43Extended (with tools) | 54.2023 / 43Thinking High (With Tools) | +10.10 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.605 / 108Extended (with tools) | 80.6010 / 108Thinking High (With Tools) | +7 |
Math and Reasoning
Opus 4.7 2/2| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath | 43.806 / 60极高强度思考（无工具） | 36.9011 / 60Thinking High (No Tools) | +6.90 |
| FrontierMath - Tier 4 | 22.9012 / 80极高强度思考（无工具） | 16.7020 / 80Normal (No Tools) | +6.20 |
AI Agent - Information Search
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1/1| Benchmark | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | 79.3013 / 45Extended (with tools) | 85.903 / 45Thinking High (With Tools + Internet) | -6.60 |
Specs
| Field | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Anthropic | Google Deep Mind |
| Release date | 2026-04-16 | 2026-02-20 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Multimodal model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 1000K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 32K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $5 / 1M tokens | $2 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $25 / 1M tokens | $12 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.5 / 1M tokens | Not public |
| Cache write | $6.25 / 1M tokens | Not public |
Summary
- Opus 4.7leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), Math and Reasoning (2/2)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewleads in:General Knowledge (3/5), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1)
- Tied in:AI Agent - Tool Usage
On average across the 12 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 2.02 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: SWE-Bench Pro - Public — Opus 4.7 64.30 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 54.20 (+10.10).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.