DataLearner logo

Claude Opus 5vsGPT-5.6 Sol

Across 3 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 leads overall: Claude Opus 5 wins 2, GPT-5.6 Sol wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +6.22.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5

Anthropic · 2026-07-24 · Reasoning model

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI · 2026-06-26 · Reasoning model

Claude Opus 52 wins(67%)(33%)1 winGPT-5.6 Sol

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.

Coding and Software Engineer

Even 2/2
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 SolDiff
SWE-Bench Pro - Public79.202 / 54Max (With Tools)64.606 / 54极高强度思考(工具)+14.60
DeepSWE68.804 / 19Max (With Tools)72.701 / 19极高强度思考(工具)-3.90

AI Agent - Tool Usage

Claude Opus 5 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 SolDiff
OSWorld 2.070.571 / 2Max (With Tools)62.602 / 2极高强度思考(工具)+7.97

Specs

FieldClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol
PublisherAnthropicOpenAI
Release date2026-07-242026-06-26
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
ParametersNot availableNot available
Context length1M1.05M
Max output128K128K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Text input$5 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Text output$25 / 1M tokens$30 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.5 / 1M tokens$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache write$6.25 / 1M tokens$6.25 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Claude Opus 5leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1)
  • Tied in:Coding and Software Engineer

On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 scores 6.22 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: SWE-Bench Pro - Public — Claude Opus 5 79.20 vs GPT-5.6 Sol 64.60 (+14.60).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.