Claude Opus 5 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 5 of 7 shared benchmarks, averaging 4.0 points higher
Summarised only from the 7 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below. A further 4 historical, reverse-direction or differently scaled metrics are excluded; indexes, cost and time are not added to accuracy percentages.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: 综合评估 +14.5 / Relative gap: 数学推理 -6.7
Relative edge: 数学推理 +6.7 / Relative gap: 综合评估 -14.5
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
23 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
63.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 61.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
97.50Thinking Level · Extra High | 97.50Thinking Level · Extra High | |
90.40Thinking Level · High | 92.50Thinking Level · High | |
30.20Thinking Level · High | 7.80Thinking Level · High | |
64.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 49.50Thinking Level · High | |
93.88Thinking Level · High | 94.60Thinking Level · High | |
68.80Thinking Level · High | Tools | 72.70Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
79.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | 64.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
1711.88Thinking Level · High | 1620.27Thinking Level · Extra High | |
91.59Thinking Level · High | Tools | 88.76Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
2120.60Standard Mode | 1963.40Standard Mode | |
80.60Thinking Level · High | 64.80Thinking Level · Extra High | |
90.80Thinking Level · High | Tools | 90.40Thinking Level · High | |
97.72Thinking Level · High | 97.63Thinking Level · High | |
70.57Thinking Level · High | Tools | 65.70Thinking Level · High | |
51.82Thinking Level · High | Tools | 37.27Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
30.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | 22.40Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
53.75Thinking Level · High | Tools | 47.50Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
1686.73Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 1493.92Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
26.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | 18.10Thinking Level · High | |
1861.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | 1728.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
73.17Thinking Level · High | 83.00Thinking Level · High | |
85.61Thinking Level · High | 89.12Thinking Level · High |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Reviewed 2026-09-05 · Official documentation
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-07-24 | 2026-06-26 |
Context length | 1M | 1.05M |
Max output length | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
Architecture | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
Runtime modes | 关闭低中高极高最高 | 关闭低中高极高最高 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Not public |
Weight availability | Not public | Not public |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing Claude Opus 5 | Previewing GPT-5.6 Sol: a next-generation model |

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI