Gemini 3.5 FlashvsOpus 4.7
Gemini 3.5 Flash and Opus 4.7 are tied across 8 shared benchmarks: Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on 4, Opus 4.7 leads on 4, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -0.36.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google Deep Mind · 2026-06-20 · Multimodal model
Opus 4.7
Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model
Gemini 3.5 Flash4 wins(50%)(50%)4 winsOpus 4.7
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 8 shared benchmarks.
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Gemini 3.5 Flash 3/3| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| TerminalBench 2.1 | 76.208 / 16Thinking High (With Tools) | 69.7011 / 16Thinking High (With Tools) | +6.50 |
| MCP-Atlas | 83.601 / 23Thinking High (With Tools) | 79.105 / 23Deep Thinking (With Tools) | +4.50 |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78.406 / 19Thinking High (With Tools) | 787 / 19Extended (with tools) | +0.40 |
General Knowledge
Opus 4.7 3/3| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 40.2055 / 161Thinking High (With Tools) | 54.709 / 161Extended (with tools) | -14.50 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1011 / 59Thinking High (With Tools) | 75.809 / 59最高（无工具） | -3.70 |
| LiveBench | 75.0217 / 115Thinking High (No Tools) | 76.917 / 115Deep Thinking (No Tools) | -1.89 |
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 55.1021 / 44Thinking High (With Tools) | 64.304 / 44Extended (with tools) | -9.20 |
Math and Reasoning
Gemini 3.5 Flash 1/1| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Bench | 76.704 / 63Normal (No Tools) | 61.7013 / 63Normal (No Tools) | +15 |
Specs
| Field | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Google Deep Mind | Anthropic |
| Release date | 2026-06-20 | 2026-04-16 |
| Model type | Multimodal model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 1M | 1000K |
| Max output | 64K | 128K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $1.5 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $9 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | Not public | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $6.25 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Gemini 3.5 Flashleads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (3/3), Math and Reasoning (1/1)
- Opus 4.7leads in:General Knowledge (3/3), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)
On average across the 8 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 0.36 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Simple Bench — Gemini 3.5 Flash 76.70 vs Opus 4.7 61.70 (+15).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.