DataLearner logoDataLearnerAI
Latest AI Insights
Model Leaderboards
Benchmarks
Model Directory
Model Comparison
Resource Center
Tools
LanguageEnglish
DataLearner logoDataLearner AI

A knowledge platform focused on LLM benchmarking, datasets, and practical instruction with continuously updated capability maps.

Products

  • Leaderboards
  • Model comparison
  • Datasets

Resources

  • Tutorials
  • Editorial
  • Tool directory

Company

  • About
  • Privacy policy
  • Data methodology
  • Contact

© 2026 DataLearner AI. DataLearner curates industry data and case studies so researchers, enterprises, and developers can rely on trustworthy intelligence.

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeAI ModelsGemini 3.5 Flash vs Opus 4.7

Gemini 3.5 FlashvsOpus 4.7

Across 4 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 leads overall: Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 1, Opus 4.7 wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -6.75.

Google Deep Mind
Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google Deep Mind · 2026-06-20 · Multimodal model

Anthropic
Opus 4.7

Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model

Gemini 3.5 Flash1 win(25%)(75%)3 winsOpus 4.7

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 4 shared benchmarks.

General Knowledge

Opus 4.7 2/2
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7Diff
HLE40.2045 / 150Thinking High (With Tools)54.706 / 150Extended (with tools)-14.50
ARC-AGI-272.1011 / 59Thinking High (With Tools)75.809 / 59最高(无工具)-3.70

AI Agent - Tool Usage

Gemini 3.5 Flash 1/1
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7Diff
OSWorld-Verified78.403 / 15Thinking High (With Tools)784 / 15Extended (with tools)+0.40

Coding and Software Engineer

Opus 4.7 1/1
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7Diff
SWE-Bench Pro - Public55.1015 / 38Thinking High (With Tools)64.302 / 38Extended (with tools)-9.20

Specs

FieldGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7
PublisherGoogle Deep MindAnthropic
Release date2026-06-202026-04-16
Model typeMultimodal modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
Parameters0.00.0
Context length1M1000K
Max output65536131072

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7
Text input$1.5 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Text output$9 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
Cache readNot public$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache writeNot public$6.25 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Gemini 3.5 Flashleads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1)
  • Opus 4.7leads in:General Knowledge (2/2), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)

On average across the 4 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 6.75 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: HLE — Gemini 3.5 Flash 40.20 vs Opus 4.7 54.70 (-14.50).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.

Gemini 3.5 Flash detailsOpus 4.7 details·Customize in compare tool