DataLearner logoDataLearnerAI
Latest AI Insights
Model Leaderboards
Benchmarks
Model Directory
Model Comparison
Resource Center
Tools
LanguageEnglish
DataLearner logoDataLearner AI

A knowledge platform focused on LLM benchmarking, datasets, and practical instruction with continuously updated capability maps.

Products

  • Leaderboards
  • Model comparison
  • Datasets

Resources

  • Tutorials
  • Editorial
  • Tool directory

Company

  • About
  • Privacy policy
  • Data methodology
  • Contact

© 2026 DataLearner AI. DataLearner curates industry data and case studies so researchers, enterprises, and developers can rely on trustworthy intelligence.

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeModel CompareGemini 3.5 Flash vs Opus 4.7 评测对比

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Opus 4.7 评测对比

See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

Google Deep Mind

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google Deep Mind

Release
2026-06-20
Context length
1M
Parameters
Not provided
最大输出
65,536 tokens
Model profile·Playground

Capability profile

Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.

View: Non-parallel mode average·3 dimensions
Gemini 3.5 Flash

Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: 编程与软件工程 -9.2

Opus 4.7

Relative edge: 编程与软件工程 +9.2 / Relative gap: none clear

Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.

Best overall

Opus 4.7 · 68.20

Best single

Gemini 3.5 Flash · OSWorld-Verified 78.40

Modality coverage

Gemini 3.5 Flash · 1 modalities

Head to head

Gemini 3.5 Flash
1
3
Opus 4.7
AheadTiedBehind

4

Benchmarks

1

Wins

3

Losses

-6.75

Average diff

Performance benchmarks

Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.

Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology

Thinking
Tool usage
Internet
Filter: Best Available·2 modes · 4 Benchmark
图表加载中...

Benchmark score table

Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.

4 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashOpus 4.7
ARC-AGI-2
综合评估
72.10Thinking Level · High | Tools
75.80Thinking Level · High
HLE
综合评估
40.20Thinking Level · High | Tools
54.70Extended Thinking | Tools
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
55.10Thinking Level · High | Tools
64.30Extended Thinking | Tools
OSWorld-Verified
AI Agent - 工具使用
78.40Thinking Level · High | Tools
78.00Extended Thinking | Tools

API price comparison

Side-by-side input/output token pricing

Detailed feature breakdown

Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.

Features & specs
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle Deep Mind
Opus 4.7Anthropic
Core specsRelease
2026-06-202026-04-16
Context length
1M1000K
Max output
65536131072
MoE
NoNo
LicenseCode Open Source
Not providedNot provided
Weights Open Source
Not providedNot provided
Commercial use
不开源不开源
Modality supportText Input/Output
/
/
ResourcesPaper / report
Gemini 3.5: frontier intelligence with actionIntroducing Claude Opus 4.7
DataLearner blog
Not providedAnthropic发布Claude Opus 4.7:编程能力大幅跃升,视觉分辨率提升超3倍,首个搭载网络安全防护机制的旗舰模型!
Anthropic

Opus 4.7

Anthropic

Release
2026-04-16
Context length
1000K
Parameters
Not provided
最大输出
131,072 tokens
Model profile·Playground