GLM-5.2vsGLM 5.1
Across 11 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 leads overall: GLM-5.2 wins 8, GLM 5.1 wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +16.17.
GLM-5.28 wins(73%)(27%)3 winsGLM 5.1
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 11 shared benchmarks.
General Knowledge
Even 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 9.80392 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | 27.90226 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | -18.10 |
| LiveBench | 73.1821 / 117Normal (No Tools) | 70.1837 / 117Normal (No Tools) | +3 |
Math and Reasoning
GLM-5.2 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMO-AnswerBench | 912 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | 83.8014 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | +7.20 |
| AIME 2026 | 99.203 / 30Thinking (No Tools) | 95.3013 / 30Thinking (No Tools) | +3.90 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Decathlon | 48.204 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | 40.706 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | +7.50 |
Claw-style Agent Evaluation
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| PinchBench v2 | 86.985 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | 59.9533 / 45Reported best (effort unspecified) | +27.03 |
Coding and Software Engineer
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 62.1012 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | 58.4020 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | +3.70 |
Commonsense Reasoning
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 58.8036 / 93Normal (No Tools) | 55.1042 / 93Normal (No Tools) | +3.70 |
General Evaluation
GLM 5.1 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.21310 / 462Normal (No Tools) | 83.90180 / 462Normal (No Tools) | -12.69 |
Long Context
GLM 5.1 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 42.30154 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 53.30134 / 170Normal (No Tools) | -11 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,75322 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,58940 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +163.60 |
Specs
| Field | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | 智谱AI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-06-13 | 2026-03-27 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 753.33B | 754B |
| Context length | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | 128K | 125K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $1.4 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $4.4 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.26 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- GLM-5.2leads in:Math and Reasoning (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), Claw-style Agent Evaluation (1/1), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), Commonsense Reasoning (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- GLM 5.1leads in:General Evaluation (1/1), Long Context (1/1)
- Tied in:General Knowledge
On average across the 11 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores 16.17 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — GLM-5.2 1,753 vs GLM 5.1 1,589 (+163.60).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.