GLM-5.2vsGLM 5.1
Across 9 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 leads overall: GLM-5.2 wins 9, GLM 5.1 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +24.14.
GLM-5.29 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsGLM 5.1
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 9 shared benchmarks.
AI Agent - Tool Usage
GLM-5.2 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 8125 / 53Thinking High (With Tools) | 58.7046 / 53Thinking High (With Tools) | +22.30 |
| Tool Decathlon | 48.204 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | 40.706 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | +7.50 |
General Knowledge
GLM-5.2 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench | 73.1821 / 117Normal (No Tools) | 70.1837 / 117Normal (No Tools) | +3 |
| HLE | 54.7021 / 197Thinking (With Tools) | 52.3027 / 197Thinking (With Tools) | +2.40 |
Math and Reasoning
GLM-5.2 2/2| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMO-AnswerBench | 912 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | 83.8014 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | +7.20 |
| AIME 2026 | 99.201 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | 95.304 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | +3.90 |
Coding and Software Engineer
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 62.1012 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | 58.4020 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | +3.70 |
Commonsense Reasoning
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 58.8036 / 94Normal (No Tools) | 55.1042 / 94Normal (No Tools) | +3.70 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
GLM-5.2 1/1| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,75322 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,58940 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +163.60 |
Specs
| Field | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | 智谱AI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-06-13 | 2026-03-27 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 753.33B | 754B |
| Context length | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | 128K | 125K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | GLM-5.2 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $1.4 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $4.4 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.26 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- GLM-5.2leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (2/2), General Knowledge (2/2), Math and Reasoning (2/2), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1), Commonsense Reasoning (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
On average across the 9 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores 24.14 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — GLM-5.2 1,753 vs GLM 5.1 1,589 (+163.60).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.