Qwen3.6-Max-PreviewvsOpus 4.7
Across 6 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 leads overall: Qwen3.6-Max-Preview wins 1, Opus 4.7 wins 5, with 0 ties and an average score difference of -4.67.
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
阿里巴巴 · 2026-04-18 · Chat model
Opus 4.7
Anthropic · 2026-04-16 · Reasoning model
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview1 win(17%)(83%)5 winsOpus 4.7
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 6 shared benchmarks.
Coding and Software Engineer
Opus 4.7 2/2| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 78.8021 / 114Thinking (With Tools) | 87.606 / 114Extended (with tools) | -8.80 |
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 57.3020 / 57Deep Thinking (With Tools) | 64.308 / 57Extended (with tools) | -7 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 65.4011 / 48Deep Thinking (With Tools) | 69.406 / 48Extended (with tools) | -4 |
Commonsense Reasoning
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 6311 / 67Normal (No Tools) | 62.9012 / 67Normal (No Tools) | +0.10 |
General Evaluation
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.4036 / 226最高（无工具） | 94.205 / 226Extended (no tools) | -3.80 |
General Knowledge
Opus 4.7 1/1| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 50.2029 / 181Thinking (With Tools) | 54.7015 / 181Extended (with tools) | -4.50 |
Specs
| Field | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | 阿里巴巴 | Anthropic |
| Release date | 2026-04-18 | 2026-04-16 |
| Model type | Chat model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Parameters | Not available | Not available |
| Context length | 262K | 1000K |
| Max output | 64K | 128K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $1.3 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $7.8 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | Not public | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | Not public | $6.25 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Qwen3.6-Max-Previewleads in:Commonsense Reasoning (1/1)
- Opus 4.7leads in:Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1)
On average across the 6 shared benchmarks, Opus 4.7 scores 4.67 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: SWE-bench Verified — Qwen3.6-Max-Preview 78.80 vs Opus 4.7 87.60 (-8.80).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.