加载中...
加载中...
Composer 2 currently shows benchmark results led by Terminal Bench 2.0 (5 / 27, score 61.70), SWE-bench Multilingual (1 / 3, score 73.70). This page also compares it with 3 competitor models and 2 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 1 source link is attached for reference.
Side-by-side benchmark comparison of Composer 2 against leading peer models
Vertical view
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier.
Default supplier standard price · Billing unit: USD / 1M tokens · Current model: bold label
When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:
Track the evolution of the Composer 2 series across generations
Vertical view
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier.
Default supplier standard price · Billing unit: USD / 1M tokens · Current model: bold label
Top: multi-benchmark panorama. Bottom: single-benchmark mode relation with dotted links inside each generation.
Tip: click any score cell to switch the chart below.
| Benchmark | Composer 1.52/9/2026 | Composer 23/19/2026 |
|---|---|---|
Note: X-axis is model (with release date), Y-axis is score. Dotted lines connect modes within the same generation.