Composer 1.5 Benchmark Details

Composer 1.5 currently shows benchmark results led by Terminal Bench 2.0 (37 / 48, score 47.90), SWE-bench Multilingual (28 / 30, score 65.90). This page also compares it with 1 competitor models and 1 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 1 source link is attached for reference.

Benchmark Results

Composer 1.5

Benchmark Results

Agentic Development

1 evaluations

Benchmark / mode

Score

Rank/total

Terminal Bench 2.0

Thinking Mode

47.90

37 / 48

Repository Engineering

1 evaluations

Benchmark / mode

Score

Rank/total

SWE-bench Multilingual

Thinking Mode

65.90

28 / 30

Compare with other models

Competitor Comparison

Benchmark scores for Composer 1.5 compared against top models in its class

Composer 1.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Benchmark categories:

The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

1 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

Benchmark	Composer 1.5Current	Claude Sonnet 4.5
Terminal Bench 2.0 Accuracy Agentic Development	47.90Thinking Enabled	42.80Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools

Standard API Pricing: Composer 1.5 vs. Peer Models

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:

Claude Sonnet 4.5: Base price applies to <= 200000

Model	Supplier	Standard input	Standard output	Base price applies to
Composer 1.5	Cursor	$3.5 / 1M tokens	$17.5 / 1M tokens	—
Claude Sonnet 4.5	Anthropic	$3 / 1M tokens	$15 / 1M tokens	<= 200000

Version History

How each version of the Composer 1.5 series stacks up on benchmark tests

Composer 1.5Composer 1

Benchmark categories:

2 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.· Click a row to view its trend chart.

Benchmark	Composer 1.5Current	Composer 1
Terminal Bench 2.0 Accuracy Agentic Development	47.90Thinking Enabled	40.00Thinking Enabled
SWE-bench Multilingual Accuracy Repository Engineering	65.90Thinking Enabled	56.90Thinking Enabled

Single-Benchmark Version Trend

Viewing: Terminal Bench 2.0 · Agentic Development

Benchmark

NormalNormal + ToolsThinkingThinking + ToolsDeepDeep + Tools

X-axis shows model and release date, Y-axis shows score; solid lines connect the same mode across versions, while dotted guides align modes within the same generation.

Standard API Pricing Across the Composer 1.5 Series

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

Model	Supplier	Standard input	Standard output	Base price applies to
Composer 1.5	Cursor	$3.5 / 1M tokens	$17.5 / 1M tokens	—
Composer 1	Cursor	$1.25 / 1M tokens	$10 / 1M tokens	—

Sources

cursor.comcursor.com