Gemini 3.5 Flash Benchmark Details
Gemini 3.5 Flash currently shows benchmark results led by MMMU-Pro (12 / 229, score 84.30), MedCode (4 / 64, score 55.83), GPQA Diamond (20 / 253, score 92.80). This page also compares it with 3 competitor models and 2 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 1 source link is attached for reference.
Benchmark Results
Benchmark Results
Abstract Generalization
2 evaluationsScientific Reasoning
5 evaluationsRepository Engineering
3 evaluationsAgentic Development
4 evaluationsMemory & Persistence
5 evaluationsTool Orchestration
3 evaluationsCapability Indices
3 evaluationsVisual Understanding
3 evaluationsDocuments & Charts
3 evaluationsLong Retrieval
2 evaluationsService Workflows
3 evaluationsLegal
3 evaluationsFinance
2 evaluationsMathematics
3 evaluationsCode Generation & Editing
1 evaluationsClinical Workflows
2 evaluationsCompetitor Comparison
Benchmark scores for Gemini 3.5 Flash compared against top models in its class
12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 FlashCurrent | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
92.50Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 86.50Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 93.50Thinking Level · High | 95.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
72.08Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 60.42Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 75.80Thinking Level · High | 85.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
40.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 49.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools | 54.70Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 52.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | |
13.10Thinking Level · High | 3.10Thinking Level · High | 12.00Thinking Level · High | 27.10Thinking Level · Extra High | |
92.80Thinking Level · High | 89.90Thinking Enabled | 94.20Extended Thinking | 94.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
76.70Standard Mode | -- | 61.70Standard Mode | 69.00Standard Mode | |
37.00Thinking Level · Medium ｜ Tools | 29.93Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- | 67.04Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | |
55.10Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- | 64.30Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 58.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | |
74.64Thinking Level · High | 75.32Thinking Level · High | 76.53Deep Thinking Mode | 79.91Deep Thinking Mode | |
46.20Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 53.00Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 54.50Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 60.60Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | |
6.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 3.00Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- | 14.60Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | |
77.19Thinking Level · High | 82.82Thinking Level · High | 46.70Thinking Level · Low | 94.18Thinking Level · Extra High |
Standard API Pricing: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. Peer Models
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens
| Model | Supplier | Standard input | Standard output | Base price applies to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.5 Flash | Google DeepMind | $1.5 / 1M tokens | $9 / 1M tokens | — |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | — |
Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | — |
GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $5 / 1M tokens | $30 / 1M tokens | — |
Version History
How each version of the Gemini 3.5 Flash series stacks up on benchmark tests
12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.· Click a row to view its trend chart.
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 FlashCurrent | Gemini 3.0 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
92.50Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- | 32.30Standard Mode | |
72.08Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 33.60Thinking Enabled | -- | |
40.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 43.50Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools | 12.08Thinking Level · High | |
13.10Thinking Level · High | 8.60Thinking Enabled | 1.40Standard Mode | |
92.80Thinking Level · High | 90.40Thinking Enabled | 82.80Thinking Enabled | |
76.70Standard Mode | 61.10Standard Mode | 41.20Standard Mode | |
55.10Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 49.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- | |
74.64Thinking Level · High | 72.40Thinking Level · High | 47.74Thinking Level · High | |
46.20Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 38.60Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools | 13.60Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools | |
83.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 62.00Standard Mode ｜ Tools | -- | |
74.17Thinking Level · High | 72.06Thinking Level · High | -- | |
154.55Thinking Level · High | 151.83Thinking Level · High | -- |
Single-Benchmark Version Trend
Viewing: ARC-AGI-1 · Abstract Generalization
Standard API Pricing Across the Gemini 3.5 Flash Series
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens
| Model | Supplier | Standard input | Standard output | Base price applies to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.5 Flash | Google DeepMind | $1.5 / 1M tokens | $9 / 1M tokens | — |
Gemini 3.0 Flash | Google DeepMind | $0.5 / 1M tokens | $3 / 1M tokens | — |
Gemini 2.5 Flash | Google DeepMind | $0.3 / 1M tokens | $2.5 / 1M tokens | — |