Qwen3.7-Max-Preview Benchmark Details

Qwen3.7-Max-Preview currently shows benchmark results led by MMLU Pro (4 / 126, score 89.60), LiveCodeBench (4 / 120, score 91.60), GPQA Diamond (11 / 179, score 92.40). This page also compares it with 3 competitor models and 2 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 1 source link is attached for reference.

Benchmark Results

Qwen3.7-Max-Preview

Benchmark Results

Thinking
Tool usage

General Knowledge

4 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
GPQA Diamond
Thinking Level · Max
92.40
11 / 179
MMLU Pro
Thinking Level · Max
89.60
4 / 126
HLE
Thinking ModeTools
53.50
12 / 161
HLE
Thinking Level · Max
41.40
50 / 161

Coding and Software Engineer

4 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
LiveCodeBench
Thinking Level · Max
91.60
4 / 120
SWE-bench Verified
Thinking ModeTools
80.40
12 / 108
SWE-bench Multilingual
Thinking ModeTools
78.30
3 / 20
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
Thinking ModeTools
60.60
6 / 44

Instruction Following

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
IF Bench
Thinking Level · Max
79.10
2 / 29

AI Agent - Tool Usage

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
Terminal Bench 2.0
Thinking ModeTools
69.70
5 / 46

Math and Reasoning

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
IMO-AnswerBench
Thinking Level · Max
90
2 / 20

Competitor Comparison

Benchmark scores for Qwen3.7-Max-Preview compared against top models in its class

Benchmark categories:
The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

9 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkQwen3.7-Max-PreviewCurrentKimi K2.6DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM 5.1
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
92.40Thinking Level · High
--
90.10Thinking Level · High
86.20Thinking Enabled
HLE
综合评估
53.50Thinking Enabled | Tools
54.00Thinking Enabled | Tools
48.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
52.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
MMLU Pro
综合评估
89.60Thinking Level · High
--
87.50Thinking Level · High
--
LiveCodeBench
编程与软件工程
91.60Thinking Level · High
--
93.50Thinking Level · High
--
SWE-bench Multilingual
编程与软件工程
78.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
76.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
76.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
--
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
60.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
58.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
55.40Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
58.40Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-bench Verified
编程与软件工程
80.40Thinking Enabled | Tools
80.20Thinking Enabled | Tools
80.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
--
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
69.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
66.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
67.90Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
63.50Thinking Enabled | Tools
IMO-AnswerBench
数学推理
90.00Thinking Level · High
--
89.80Thinking Level · High
83.80Thinking Enabled

Standard API Pricing: Qwen3.7-Max-Preview vs. Peer Models

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

ModelSupplierStandard inputStandard outputBase price applies to
Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
阿里巴巴$2.5 / 1M tokens$7.5 / 1M tokens
Kimi K2.6
Facebook AI研究实验室$0.95 / 1M tokens$4 / 1M tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek-AI$0.435 / 1M tokens$0.87 / 1M tokens
GLM 5.1
智谱AI$1.4 / 1M tokens$4.4 / 1M tokens

Version History

How each version of the Qwen3.7-Max-Preview series stacks up on benchmark tests

Benchmark categories:
The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

10 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.· Click a row to view its trend chart.

BenchmarkQwen3.7-Max-PreviewCurrentQwen3.6-Max-PreviewQwen3-Max-Thinking
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
92.40Thinking Level · High
90.40Thinking Level · High
87.40Thinking Enabled
HLE
综合评估
53.50Thinking Enabled | Tools
50.20Thinking Enabled | Tools
49.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
MMLU Pro
综合评估
89.60Thinking Level · High
88.50Thinking Level · High
85.70Thinking Enabled
LiveCodeBench
编程与软件工程
91.60Thinking Level · High
87.10Thinking Level · High
85.90Thinking Enabled
SWE-bench Multilingual
编程与软件工程
78.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
73.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
--
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
60.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
56.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
--
SWE-bench Verified
编程与软件工程
80.40Thinking Enabled | Tools
78.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
75.30Thinking Enabled
IF Bench
指令跟随
79.10Thinking Level · High
74.20Thinking Level · High
70.90Thinking Enabled | Tools
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
69.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
65.40Deep Thinking Mode | Tools
--
IMO-AnswerBench
数学推理
90.00Thinking Level · High
83.80Thinking Level · High
83.90Thinking Enabled

Single-Benchmark Version Trend

Viewing: GPQA Diamond · 综合评估

Benchmark
NormalNormal + ToolsThinkingThinking + ToolsDeepDeep + Tools

X-axis shows model and release date, Y-axis shows score; solid lines connect the same mode across versions, while dotted guides align modes within the same generation.

Standard API Pricing Across the Qwen3.7-Max-Preview Series

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: Base price applies to <= 128
ModelSupplierStandard inputStandard outputBase price applies to
Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
阿里巴巴$2.5 / 1M tokens$7.5 / 1M tokens
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
阿里巴巴$1.3 / 1M tokens$7.8 / 1M tokens<= 128

Sources