DataLearner logoDataLearnerAI
Latest AI Insights
Model Leaderboards
Benchmarks
Model Directory
Model Comparison
Resource Center
Tools
LanguageEnglish
DataLearner logoDataLearner AI

A knowledge platform focused on LLM benchmarking, datasets, and practical instruction with continuously updated capability maps.

Products

  • Leaderboards
  • Model comparison
  • Datasets

Resources

  • Tutorials
  • Editorial
  • Tool directory

Company

  • About
  • Privacy policy
  • Data methodology
  • Contact

© 2026 DataLearner AI. DataLearner curates industry data and case studies so researchers, enterprises, and developers can rely on trustworthy intelligence.

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeModel CompareKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.6-Max-Preview 评测对比

Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.6-Max-Preview 评测对比

See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

Moonshot AI

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI

Release
2026-04-20
Context length
256K
Parameters
10,000 (act 320)
支持模态
常规模式(Non-Thinking Mode) · 思考模式(Thinking Mode)
Model profile·Playground
阿里巴巴

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview

阿里巴巴

Release
2026-04-20
Context length
262K
Parameters
10,000
最大输出
8,192 tokens
Model profile·Playground
Loading comparison...

Capability profile

Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.

View: Non-parallel mode average·3 dimensions
Kimi K2.6

Relative edge: 综合评估 +14.5 / Relative gap: none clear

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview

Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: 综合评估 -14.5

Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.

Best overall

Kimi K2.6 · 67.24

Best single

Kimi K2.6 · SWE-bench Verified 80.20

Modality coverage

Kimi K2.6 · 3 modalities

Head to head

Kimi K2.6
5
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
AheadTiedBehind

5

Benchmarks

5

Wins

0

Losses

+2.28

Average diff

Performance benchmarks

Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.

Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology

Thinking
Tool usage
Internet
Filter: Best Available·2 modes · 5 Benchmark
图表加载中...

Benchmark score table

Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.

5 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkKimi K2.6Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
HLE
综合评估
54.00Thinking Enabled | Tools
50.20Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-bench Multilingual
编程与软件工程
76.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
73.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
58.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
56.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-bench Verified
编程与软件工程
80.20Thinking Enabled | Tools
78.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
66.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
65.40Deep Thinking Mode | Tools

API price comparison

Side-by-side input/output token pricing

Detailed feature breakdown

Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.

Features & specs
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview阿里巴巴
Core specsRelease
2026-04-202026-04-20
Context length
256K262K
Parameters
1000010000
Active parameters
320Not provided
Max output
Not provided8192
MoE
YesYes
Supported modes
常规模式(Non-Thinking Mode)思考模式(Thinking Mode)
No mode data
LicenseCode Open Source
Not providedNot provided
Weights Open Source
Not providedNot provided
Commercial use
免费商用授权不开源
Modality supportText Input/Output
/
Not provided
Image Input/Output
/
Not provided
Video Input/Output
/
Not provided
ResourcesPaper / report
Kimi K2.6: Advancing Open-Source Coding阿里发布Qwen3.6-Max预览版