DataLearner logo

Claude Opus 4.6vsOpus 4.5

Across 14 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 leads overall: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 11, Opus 4.5 wins 3, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +17.34.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · 2026-02-05 · Reasoning model

Anthropic
Opus 4.5

Anthropic · 2025-11-25 · Reasoning model

Claude Opus 4.611 wins(79%)(21%)3 winsOpus 4.5

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 14 shared benchmarks.

Agent Level Benchmark

Claude Opus 4.6 2/3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
τ²-Bench91.891 / 44Extended (with tools)81.9913 / 44Extended (with tools)+9.90
Terminal Bench Hard48.5025 / 244Normal (With Tools)40.9050 / 244Normal (With Tools)+7.60
τ²-Bench - Telecom84.8090 / 264Normal (With Tools)86.3082 / 264Normal (With Tools)-1.50

Coding and Software Engineer

Claude Opus 4.6 2/3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
Text Arena (Coding)1,5558 / 35Normal (No Tools)1,47920 / 35Normal (No Tools)+76.35
GSO33.335 / 21Normal (With Tools)26.508 / 21Normal (With Tools)+6.83
SWE-bench Verified80.8410 / 116Extended (with tools)80.909 / 116Extended (with tools)-0.06

General Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.6 2/2
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
ARC-AGI-19240 / 147Extended (no tools)8073 / 147Extended (no tools)+12
CritPt2.80120 / 200Normal (No Tools)0.30182 / 200Normal (No Tools)+2.50

AI Agent - Tool Usage

Claude Opus 4.6 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
Terminal Bench 2.065.4011 / 48Extended (with tools)59.3020 / 48Extended (with tools)+6.10

General Evaluation

Claude Opus 4.6 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
GPQA Diamond84176 / 462Normal (No Tools)81220 / 462Normal (No Tools)+3

Instruction Following

Claude Opus 4.6 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
IF Bench44.60182 / 282Normal (No Tools)43194 / 282Normal (No Tools)+1.60

Long Context

Opus 4.5 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
AA-LCR67116 / 170Normal (No Tools)70.7099 / 170Normal (No Tools)-3.70

Multimodal Understanding

Claude Opus 4.6 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
MMMU-Pro72.50114 / 227Normal (No Tools)71.20120 / 227Normal (No Tools)+1.30

Writing and Creative Capabilities

Claude Opus 4.6 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5Diff
Creative Writing1,80419 / 106Normal (No Tools)1,68329 / 106Normal (No Tools)+120.90

Specs

FieldClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5
PublisherAnthropicAnthropic
Release date2026-02-052025-11-25
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
ParametersNot availableNot available
Context length1000K200K
Max output64K64K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemClaude Opus 4.6Opus 4.5
Text input$5 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Text output$25 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.5 / 1M tokens$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache write$6.25 / 1M tokens$6.25 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Claude Opus 4.6leads in:Agent Level Benchmark (2/3), Coding and Software Engineer (2/3), General Knowledge (2/2), AI Agent - Tool Usage (1/1), General Evaluation (1/1), Instruction Following (1/1), Multimodal Understanding (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
  • Opus 4.5leads in:Long Context (1/1)

On average across the 14 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 17.34 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Claude Opus 4.6 1,804 vs Opus 4.5 1,683 (+120.90).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.