Claude Opus 4.8vsOpus 4.5

Across 3 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 leads overall: Claude Opus 4.8 wins 3, Opus 4.5 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +9.67.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · 2026-05-28 · Reasoning model

Anthropic
Opus 4.5

Anthropic · 2025-11-25 · Reasoning model

Claude Opus 4.83 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsOpus 4.5

Benchmark scores

Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 3 shared benchmarks.

General Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.8 2/2
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Opus 4.5Diff
HLE57.905 / 157Extended (with tools)43.2039 / 157Extended (with tools)+14.70
GPQA Diamond93.606 / 178Thinking High (No Tools)8738 / 178Extended (no tools)+6.60

Coding and Software Engineer

Claude Opus 4.8 1/1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Opus 4.5Diff
SWE-bench Verified88.604 / 108Extended (with tools)80.908 / 108Extended (with tools)+7.70

Specs

FieldClaude Opus 4.8Opus 4.5
PublisherAnthropicAnthropic
Release date2026-05-282025-11-25
Model typeReasoning modelReasoning model
ArchitectureDenseDense
ParametersNot availableNot available
Context length1M200K
Max output125K64K

API pricing

Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.

ItemClaude Opus 4.8Opus 4.5
Text input$5 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Text output$25 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.5 / 1M tokens$0.5 / 1M tokens
Cache write$6.25 / 1M tokens$6.25 / 1M tokens

Summary

  • Claude Opus 4.8leads in:General Knowledge (2/2), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)

On average across the 3 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 scores 9.67 higher.

Largest single-benchmark gap: HLE — Claude Opus 4.8 57.90 vs Opus 4.5 43.20 (+14.70).

Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.