Kimi K2.6vsGLM 5.1
Across 18 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 leads overall: Kimi K2.6 wins 14, GLM 5.1 wins 4, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +10.73.
Kimi K2.614 wins(78%)(22%)4 winsGLM 5.1
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 18 shared benchmarks.
Agent Level Benchmark
Kimi K2.6 2/3| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ³-Banking | 23.3082 / 164Thinking (With Tools) | 13.60115 / 164Thinking (With Tools) | +9.70 |
| τ²-Bench - Telecom | 93.9043 / 264Normal (With Tools) | 97.1017 / 264Normal (With Tools) | -3.20 |
| Terminal Bench Hard | 37.9059 / 244Normal (With Tools) | 35.6070 / 244Normal (With Tools) | +2.30 |
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Kimi K2.6 3/3| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Decathlon | 502 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | 40.706 / 10Thinking (With Tools) | +9.30 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 65.9094 / 192Thinking (With Tools) | 61.80105 / 192Thinking (With Tools) | +4.10 |
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 66.7010 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | 63.5013 / 48Thinking (With Tools) | +3.20 |
Coding and Software Engineer
Kimi K2.6 2/2| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5061 / 130Thinking (No Tools) | 44.8090 / 130Thinking (No Tools) | +6.70 |
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 58.6018 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | 58.4020 / 62Thinking (With Tools) | +0.20 |
Math and Reasoning
Kimi K2.6 2/2| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMO-AnswerBench | 8610 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | 83.8014 / 24Thinking (No Tools) | +2.20 |
| AIME 2026 | 96.409 / 29Thinking (No Tools) | 95.3012 / 29Thinking (No Tools) | +1.10 |
AI Agent - Information Search
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | 83.2016 / 57Thinking (With Tools + Internet) | 79.3019 / 57Thinking (With Tools + Internet) | +3.90 |
General Evaluation
GLM 5.1 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.80249 / 462Normal (No Tools) | 83.90180 / 462Normal (No Tools) | -5.10 |
General Knowledge
GLM 5.1 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 19.60290 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | 27.90226 / 563Normal (No Tools) · Text only | -8.30 |
Instruction Following
GLM 5.1 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IF Bench | 44.30184 / 282Normal (No Tools) | 52148 / 282Normal (No Tools) | -7.70 |
Long Context
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 69.70106 / 170Normal (No Tools) | 53.30134 / 170Normal (No Tools) | +16.40 |
Multimodal Understanding
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 1365 / 118Thinking (No Tools) | 8.4086 / 118Thinking (No Tools) | +4.60 |
Text Embedding
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Arena | 51.8886 / 126Normal (No Tools) | 30.29116 / 126Normal (No Tools) | +21.59 |
Writing and Creative Capabilities
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing | 1,72125 / 106Normal (No Tools) | 1,58940 / 106Normal (No Tools) | +132.10 |
Specs
| Field | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Moonshot AI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-04-20 | 2026-03-27 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 1T | 754B |
| Context length | 256K | 200K |
| Max output | Not available | 125K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $4 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.16 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Kimi K2.6leads in:Agent Level Benchmark (2/3), AI Agent - Tool Usage (3/3), Coding and Software Engineer (2/2), Math and Reasoning (2/2), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1), Long Context (1/1), Multimodal Understanding (1/1), Text Embedding (1/1), Writing and Creative Capabilities (1/1)
- GLM 5.1leads in:General Evaluation (1/1), General Knowledge (1/1), Instruction Following (1/1)
On average across the 18 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 scores 10.73 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Creative Writing — Kimi K2.6 1,721 vs GLM 5.1 1,589 (+132.10).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.