Kimi K2.6vsGLM 5.1
Across 10 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 leads overall: Kimi K2.6 wins 9, GLM 5.1 wins 1, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +2.27.
Kimi K2.69 wins(90%)(10%)1 winGLM 5.1
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 10 shared benchmarks.
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Kimi K2.6 2/3| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Decathlon | 502 / 9Thinking (With Tools) | 40.705 / 9Thinking (With Tools) | +9.30 |
| TerminalBench 2.1 | 53.5627 / 27Thinking (No Tools) | 58.7024 / 27Thinking High (With Tools) | -5.14 |
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 66.7010 / 47Thinking (With Tools) | 63.5013 / 47Thinking (With Tools) | +3.20 |
General Knowledge
Kimi K2.6 3/3| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5018 / 187Thinking (No Tools) | 86.2047 / 187Thinking (No Tools) | +4.30 |
| LiveBench | 72.1728 / 115Thinking (No Tools) | 70.1837 / 115Normal (No Tools) | +1.99 |
| HLE | 5415 / 172Thinking (With Tools + Internet) | 52.3019 / 172Thinking (With Tools) | +1.70 |
Math and Reasoning
Kimi K2.6 2/2| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMO-AnswerBench | 868 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | 83.8012 / 21Thinking (No Tools) | +2.20 |
| AIME 2026 | 96.403 / 18Thinking (No Tools) | 95.304 / 18Thinking (No Tools) | +1.10 |
AI Agent - Information Search
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | 83.2014 / 53Thinking (With Tools + Internet) | 79.3017 / 53Thinking (With Tools + Internet) | +3.90 |
Coding and Software Engineer
Kimi K2.6 1/1| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro - Public | 58.6013 / 54Thinking (With Tools) | 58.4015 / 54Thinking (With Tools) | +0.20 |
Specs
| Field | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Moonshot AI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-04-20 | 2026-03-27 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 1T | 75.4B |
| Context length | 256K | 200K |
| Max output | Not available | 125K |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $4 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.16 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Kimi K2.6leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (2/3), General Knowledge (3/3), Math and Reasoning (2/2), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)
On average across the 10 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 scores 2.27 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Tool Decathlon — Kimi K2.6 50 vs GLM 5.1 40.70 (+9.30).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.