Kimi K2.6vsGLM 5.1
Across 8 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 leads overall: Kimi K2.6 wins 8, GLM 5.1 wins 0, with 0 ties and an average score difference of +3.24.
Kimi K2.68 wins(100%)(0%)0 winsGLM 5.1
Benchmark scores
Grouped by capability, sorted by largest gap within each. 8 shared benchmarks.
AI Agent - Tool Usage
Kimi K2.6 2/2| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Decathlon | 501 / 7Thinking (With Tools) | 40.703 / 7Thinking (With Tools) | +9.30 |
| Terminal Bench 2.0 | 66.708 / 43Thinking (With Tools) | 63.5011 / 43Thinking (With Tools) | +3.20 |
General Knowledge
Kimi K2.6 2/2| Benchmark |
|---|
Specs
| Field | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | Moonshot AI | 智谱AI |
| Release date | 2026-04-20 | 2026-03-27 |
| Model type | Reasoning model | Reasoning model |
| Architecture | MoE | MoE |
| Parameters | 10000.0 | 754.0 |
| Context length | 256K | 200K |
| Max output | Not available | 128000 |
API pricing
Prices use DataLearner records when available; missing fields are not inferred.
| Item | Kimi K2.6 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $1.4 / 1M tokens |
| Text output | $4 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.16 / 1M tokens | $4.4 / 1M tokens |
| Cache write | $0.95 / 1M tokens | $0.26 / 1M tokens |
Summary
- Kimi K2.6leads in:AI Agent - Tool Usage (2/2), General Knowledge (2/2), Math and Reasoning (2/2), AI Agent - Information Search (1/1), Coding and Software Engineer (1/1)
On average across the 8 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 scores 3.24 higher.
Largest single-benchmark gap: Tool Decathlon — Kimi K2.6 50 vs GLM 5.1 40.70 (+9.30).
Page generated from structured model, pricing and benchmark records. No real-time LLM is used to write the prose.