DataLearner logoDataLearnerAI
Latest AI Insights
Model Leaderboards
Benchmarks
Model Directory
Model Comparison
Resource Center
Tools
LanguageEnglish
DataLearner logoDataLearner AI

A knowledge platform focused on LLM benchmarking, datasets, and practical instruction with continuously updated capability maps.

Products

  • Leaderboards
  • Model comparison
  • Datasets

Resources

  • Tutorials
  • Editorial
  • Tool directory

Company

  • About
  • Privacy policy
  • Data methodology
  • Contact

© 2026 DataLearner AI. DataLearner curates industry data and case studies so researchers, enterprises, and developers can rely on trustworthy intelligence.

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeModel CompareKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.1 评测对比

Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.1 评测对比

See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

Moonshot AI

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI

Release
2026-04-20
Context length
256K
Parameters
10,000 (act 320)
支持模态
常规模式(Non-Thinking Mode) · 思考模式(Thinking Mode)
Model profile·Playground
智谱AI

GLM 5.1

智谱AI

Release
2026-03-27
Context length
200K
Parameters
754 (act 40)
最大输出
128,000 tokens
Model profile·Playground
Loading comparison...

Capability profile

Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.

View: Non-parallel mode average·5 dimensions
Kimi K2.6

Relative edge: AI Agent - 信息收集 +3.9 / Relative gap: none clear

GLM 5.1

Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: AI Agent - 信息收集 -3.9

Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.

Best overall

Kimi K2.6 · 71.00

Best single

Kimi K2.6 · AIME 2026 96.40

Modality coverage

Kimi K2.6 · 3 modalities

Head to head

Kimi K2.6
8
1
GLM 5.1
AheadTiedBehind

9

Benchmarks

8

Wins

1

Losses

+2.31

Average diff

Performance benchmarks

Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.

Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology

Thinking
Tool usage
Internet
Filter: Best Available·2 modes · 9 Benchmark
图表加载中...

Benchmark score table

Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.

9 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkKimi K2.6GLM 5.1
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
90.50Thinking Enabled
86.20Thinking Enabled
HLE
综合评估
54.00Thinking Enabled | Tools
52.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
58.60Thinking Enabled | Tools
58.40Thinking Enabled | Tools
BrowseComp
AI Agent - 信息收集
83.20Thinking Enabled | Tools
79.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
66.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
63.50Thinking Enabled | Tools
TerminalBench 2.1
AI Agent - 工具使用
53.56Thinking Enabled
58.70Thinking Level · High | Tools
Tool Decathlon
AI Agent - 工具使用
50.00Thinking Enabled | Tools
40.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
AIME 2026
数学推理
96.40Thinking Enabled
95.30Thinking Enabled
IMO-AnswerBench
数学推理
86.00Thinking Enabled
83.80Thinking Enabled

API price comparison

Side-by-side input/output token pricing

Detailed feature breakdown

Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.

Features & specs
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
GLM 5.1智谱AI
Core specsRelease
2026-04-202026-03-27
Context length
256K200K
Parameters
10000754
Active parameters
32040
Max output
Not provided128000
MoE
YesYes
Supported modes
常规模式(Non-Thinking Mode)思考模式(Thinking Mode)
No mode data
LicenseCode Open Source
Not providedClosed Source
Weights Open Source
Not providedClosed Source
Commercial use
免费商用授权免费商用授权
Modality supportText Input/Output
/
/
Image Input/Output
/
Not provided
Video Input/Output
/
Not provided
ResourcesPaper / report
Kimi K2.6: Advancing Open-Source CodingGLM-5.1: Towards Long-Horizon Tasks