DataLearner logo

Muse Spark Benchmark Details

Muse Spark currently shows benchmark results led by HLE (5 / 170, score 58), GPQA Diamond (25 / 187, score 89.50), FrontierMath (9 / 60, score 39). This page also compares it with 3 competitor models, including performance and pricing views when available. 2 source links are attached for reference.

Benchmark Results

Muse Spark

Benchmark Results

Thinking
Tool usage
Parallel

General Knowledge

5 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
GPQA Diamond
Thinking Mode
89.50
25 / 187
HLE
Thinking Mode
42.80
50 / 170
HLE
Thinking ModeTools
50.40
23 / 170
HLE
Deep Thinking Mode
58
5 / 170
ARC-AGI-2
Thinking Mode
42.50
27 / 61

Coding and Software Engineer

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
SWE-bench Verified
Thinking ModeTools
77.40
26 / 111

Math and Reasoning

3 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
FrontierMath
Thinking Mode
39
9 / 60
FrontierMath - Tier 4
Standard Mode
14.60
23 / 80
FrontierMath - Tier 4
Thinking Mode
14.60
23 / 80

Agent Level Benchmark

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
τ²-Bench - Telecom
Thinking ModeTools
92
20 / 35

AI Agent - Tool Usage

2 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
MCP-Atlas
Standard ModeTools
82.20
5 / 27
Terminal Bench 2.0
Thinking ModeTools
59
24 / 47

Productivity Knowledge

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
GDPval-AA
Thinking ModeTools
1444
5 / 21
Compare with other models

Competitor Comparison

Benchmark scores for Muse Spark compared against top models in its class

Muse SparkClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Benchmark categories:
The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

10 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkMuse SparkCurrentClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ARC-AGI-2
综合评估
42.50Thinking Enabled
66.30Extended Thinking
77.10Standard Mode
--
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
89.50Thinking Enabled
91.31Extended Thinking
--
--
HLE
综合评估
58.00Deep Thinking Mode
53.00Extended Thinking ｜ Tools
52.10Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools
51.40Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools
SWE-bench Verified
编程与软件工程
77.40Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools
80.84Extended Thinking ｜ Tools
--
80.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools
FrontierMath
数学推理
39.00Thinking Enabled
40.70Thinking Level · High
--
--
FrontierMath - Tier 4
数学推理
14.60Standard Mode
22.90Thinking Level · High
27.10Thinking Level · Extra High
16.70Standard Mode
τ²-Bench - Telecom
Agent能力评测
92.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools
99.25Extended Thinking ｜ Tools
98.90Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools
99.30Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools
MCP-Atlas
AI Agent - 工具使用
82.20Standard Mode ｜ Tools
76.80Deep Thinking Mode ｜ Tools
70.60Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools
--
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
59.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools
65.40Extended Thinking ｜ Tools
75.10Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools
68.50Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools
GDPval-AA
生产力知识
1444.00Thinking Enabled ｜ Tools
1606.00Extended Thinking ｜ Tools
--
--

Standard API Pricing: Muse Spark vs. Peer Models

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:

Claude Opus 4.6: Base price applies to <= 200K
GPT-5.4: Base price applies to <= 272K
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Base price applies to <= 200K
ModelSupplierStandard inputStandard outputBase price applies to
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic$5 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens<= 200K
GPT-5.4
OpenAI$2.5 / 1M tokens$15 / 1M tokens<= 272K
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind$2 / 1M tokens$12 / 1M tokens<= 200K

Sources

ai.meta.comai.meta.comepoch.aiepoch.ai