See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Best overall
Claude Fable 5 · 78.10
Best single
Claude Fable 5 · SWE-bench Verified 95.00
Modality coverage
Claude Fable 5 · 0 modalities
Head to head
3
Benchmarks
3
Wins
0
Losses
+16.70
Average diff
Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.
3 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
|---|---|---|
HLE 综合评估 | 59.00Deep Thinking Mode | 48.20Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools |
SWE-Bench Pro - Public 编程与软件工程 | 80.30Deep Thinking Mode ｜ Tools | 55.40Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools |
SWE-bench Verified 编程与软件工程 | 95.00Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 80.60Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools |
Side-by-side input/output token pricing
Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.
| Features & specs | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-AI |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-06-09 | 2026-04-24 |
Context length | 1M | 1M |
Parameters | — | 16000 |
Active parameters | Not provided | 490 |
Max output | 128000 | 384000 |
MoE | No | Yes |
LicenseCode Open Source | Not provided | Closed Source |
Weights Open Source | Not provided | Closed Source |
Commercial use | 不开源 | 免费商用授权 |
ResourcesPaper / report | Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek-AI
