Novice digital service designers' decision-making with decision aids — A comparison of taxonomy and tags

作者:

Highlights:

• We analyze how taxonomy and tags help design novices select design techniques.

• Taxonomy leads to lower cognitive effort and higher selection accuracy than tags.

• Increasing cognitive effort reduces the selection accuracy.

• Rational decision style moderates the relation between taxonomy and accuracy.

摘要

Digital services are a key driver of contemporary businesses. In order to scale the implementation of design-centric development processes, companies increasingly assign design work to design novices. As design novices have limited design knowledge and experience, they are challenged to select adequate design techniques throughout the entire lifecycle of digital services. Thus, providing decision aids to design novices is becoming increasingly important. In this research, we investigate taxonomy-based and tags-based decision aids. We draw on cognitive fit theory to construct a research model explaining the relationship between different decision aids and selection accuracy while considering the cognitive effort and the decision styles of novice designers. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a between-subject laboratory experiment with 195 subjects. Our experimental results provide extensive support to our hypotheses. Taxonomy-based decision aids outperform tags-based decision aids concerning selection accuracy mediated by cognitive effort. Furthermore, the results suggest rational decision style as a moderator in the relationship between taxonomy-based decision aids and selection accuracy. Our results have practical implications: First, taxonomy-based decision aids should be primarily leveraged on decision support platforms supporting design processes. Second, design novices' decision style and cognitive effort are influential factors when developing decision aids to support digital service design processes.

论文关键词:Cognitive effort,Decision aid,Decision style,Tags,Taxonomy

论文评审过程:Received 22 October 2019, Revised 16 June 2020, Accepted 16 July 2020, Available online 24 July 2020, Version of Record 19 August 2020.

论文官网地址:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113367