An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements
作者：
Highlights：
• Approximately 71.9% of the studies explained the concept of “cyberbullying”.
• Half used the word “cyberbullying”, but the other half used alternative words.
• Only 15 studies (23.4%) followed the recommended guidelines for the scale development.
• Only half assessed the validity of the cyberbullying measurement tools.
• Findings address the need for a consistent and standardized definition.
摘要
•Approximately 71.9% of the studies explained the concept of “cyberbullying”.•Half used the word “cyberbullying”, but the other half used alternative words.•Only 15 studies (23.4%) followed the recommended guidelines for the scale development.•Only half assessed the validity of the cyberbullying measurement tools.•Findings address the need for a consistent and standardized definition.
论文关键词：Cyberbullying,Measurement,Scale,Instrument,Systematic review
论文评审过程：Received 23 September 2019, Revised 10 June 2020, Accepted 13 July 2020, Available online 19 July 2020, Version of Record 25 July 2020.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485
