Computer-assisted psychological assessment in 1986: A practical guide

摘要

The controversy surrounding computer-assisted psychological assessment is noted, the literature to date surveyed, and suggestions offered for potential consumers. The sparse data currently available indicate that, absent obvious differences in response method, computer and conventional administration of objective personality inventories and ability tests are likely to produce equivalent results. Individuals are sometimes more honest when responding to a computer than when talking to an interviewer. Most people prefer the computer to conventional test administration or interviewing. Data on computer-based test interpretation are few and conflicting. The computer is not yet capable of besting an expert neuropsychologist or, in some cases, physician, but can be programmed to interpret the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory at least as well as human experts. It is suggested that CBTIs be used as adjuncts in the assessment process rather than as substitutes for informed professional judgement.