1751-1577

Journal of Informetrics （JOI） - Volume 5, Issue 1 论文列表

点击这里查看 Journal of Informetrics 的JCR分区、影响因子等信息
卷期号： Volume 5, Issue 1
发布时间： January 2011
卷期年份： 2011
卷期官网： https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-informetrics/vol/5/issue/1
本期论文列表
Editorial Board

PrestigeRank: A new evaluation method for papers and journals

Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature

On the definition of forward and backward citation generations

Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations

The measurement of low- and high-impact in citation distributions: Technical results

Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academic research groups by recent h-based indicators

Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach

Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations

The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments

How and where the TeraGrid supercomputing infrastructure benefits science

High- and low-impact citation measures: Empirical applications

An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field

Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model

A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index

Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks

Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system

Strange attractors in the Web of Science database

What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality

Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS

There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization

Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization