The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments

作者：

Highlights：

• We compare citation-based and expert-based assessments of sources (journals and series).

• The RIP, SNIP and SJR2 citation indicators correlate with quality levels in the Norwegian model.

• SNIP seems to perform substantially better than SJR2 regarding field normalization.

• SNIP and SJR2 identify sources at the highest quality level more accurately than RIP.

摘要

•We compare citation-based and expert-based assessments of sources (journals and series).•The RIP, SNIP and SJR2 citation indicators correlate with quality levels in the Norwegian model.•SNIP seems to perform substantially better than SJR2 regarding field normalization.•SNIP and SJR2 identify sources at the highest quality level more accurately than RIP.

论文关键词：Citation impact,Field normalization,Norwegian model,RIP,SJR2,SNIP

论文评审过程：Received 16 July 2014, Revised 31 August 2014, Accepted 30 September 2014, Available online 22 October 2014.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.010