Inside Front Cover: Editorial Board
A methodology to compute the territorial productivity of scientists: The case of Italy
SemPathFinder: Semantic path analysis for discovering publicly unknown knowledge
Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters
Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field
Attention decay in science
The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy
On a formula for the h-index
Author ranking based on personalized PageRank
Quality versus quantity in scientific impact
How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?
Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions
Further axiomatizations of Egghe's g-index
National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers
Assessing the impact of software on science: A bootstrapped learning of software entities in full-text papers
Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method
More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons
Interpolated sub-impact factor (SIF) sequences for journal rankings
Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist
Exploring author name disambiguation on PubMed-scale
Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach
Funnel plots for visualizing uncertainty in the research performance of institutions
Quantifying the cognitive extent of science
Multiplicative versus fractional counting methods for co-authored publications. The case of the 500 universities in the Leiden Ranking
On the stability of citation-based journal rankings
Gender differences in scientific performance: A bibliometric matching analysis of Danish health sciences Graduates
Towards an early-stage identification of emerging topics in science—The usability of bibliometric characteristics
Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?
